Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.01955

When Fibonacci and Lucas Meet Smith: A Computational Exploration

Abstract

The Fibonacci and Lucas sequences are old friends in recreational number theory. Here we ask a simple question: which of their terms $F_n$ and $L_n$ are Smith numbers? A Smith number is a composite integer whose decimal digit sum equals the sum of the decimal digits of its prime factors, counted with multiplicity. The question is easy to state, but for large $n$ it quickly becomes a factorization problem. Using available complete factorization data, we carried out computational searches in both sequences and obtained new Smith terms in each of them. For the Lucas sequence, the first author's search found ten Smith terms with indices below 1000: 3, 95, 105, 114, 183, 437, 609, 682, 827, 902. These results were published in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences as OEIS A395686. Four further indices, 1090, 1153, 1215, 1378, were subsequently added to the sequence by Sean A. Irvine. For the Fibonacci sequence, starting from the cases already recorded in OEIS A382922, our search produced seven further Smith numbers: $F_{1440}$, $F_{1554}$, $F_{1596}$, $F_{1863}$, $F_{2256}$, $F_{2277}$, $F_{2559}$. For the even-index cases, the identity $F_{2n}=F_nL_n$ allows available Fibonacci and Lucas factorization data to be combined to recover the complete factorizations needed for the Smith test. Surprisingly, the two searches also meet at index 827: both $F_{827}$ and $L_{827}$ are Smith numbers.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ronie P. Dario, João L. Gonçalves, Moniky P. N. Oliveira. 2026-09-02. When Fibonacci and Lucas Meet Smith: A Computational Exploration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01955

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT