Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.02544

A finiteness theorem for geodesic Leech wheels

Abstract

Let f be a labeling of the edges of a finite graph G by positive integers, and let the weight of a path be the sum of the labels of its edges. The labeling is a geodesic Leech labeling if the weights of the geodesics are exactly 1, 2, ..., t_gp(G), each occurring once, where t_gp(G) is the geodesic path number of G. Let W_n be the wheel on n vertices, a hub joined to an (n-1)-cycle. Our main result is an upper bound: if n >= 5 and W_n is geodesic Leech, then n <= 40. The proof quantifies, via a finite Fourier kernel, the Sidon-type structure of the spoke labels, in which only the cyclically adjacent pairs are allowed as defects, and closes the last three cases with a six-variable Parseval argument. In the other direction, explicit labelings of W_7, ..., W_13, found by a computer search, answer in the negative a problem of Lakshmanan S. and Manattu, who had found labelings of W_5 and W_6 and expected every W_n with n >= 7 to be a non-geodesic Leech graph. Writing E for the set of n >= 5 for which W_n is geodesic Leech, we obtain {5, 6, ..., 13} is contained in E, which is contained in {5, 6, ..., 40}.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Junyeop Yim. 2026-09-02. A finiteness theorem for geodesic Leech wheels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02544

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO