Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.02926

The Surviving Fragment of the Zij-i Malikshahi: A Preliminary Edition, Translation, and Study of the 100-Star Catalogue in BnF Arabe 5968

Rizoi Bakhromzod
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The astronomical programme sponsored by the Saljuq Sultan Malikshah I in the late eleventh century occupies an important place in the history of Islamic astronomy. Umar Khayyam was a principal participant in this programme, which produced the Jalali or Maliki calendar and appears also to have resulted in a broader set of astronomical tables known as the Zij-i Malikshahi. A 100-star catalogue traditionally associated with these tables survives in the anonymous Arabic compendium Dustur al-munajjimin, preserved in the unique manuscript BnF Arabe 5968. This study distinguishes the catalogue from the Jalali calendar and from the lost or unidentified complete Zij-i Malikshahi, reconstructs its historical and manuscript context, and examines the provenance of BnF Arabe 5968. It presents a complete transcription of the catalogue from fols. 224r-225r and a new English translation made directly from the Arabic text, with B. A. Rosenfeld's 1961 Russian translation used as a control. The collation identifies several divergences, including a substantive correction to the longitude of entry 8, and clarifies the planetary temperament abbreviations. Rosenfeld and A. P. Yushkevich observed that 96 of the 100 stellar longitudes correspond to Ptolemaic values increased by about 14 degrees 26 minutes, while 87 latitudes agree with Ptolemy. These correspondences suggest systematic updating of inherited Ptolemaic data rather than 100 wholly independent observations, illustrating the combined roles of observation, computation, transmission, and adaptation in medieval Islamic astronomy.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-phastro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rizoi Bakhromzod. 2026-08-26. The Surviving Fragment of the Zij-i Malikshahi: A Preliminary Edition, Translation, and Study of the 100-Star Catalogue in BnF Arabe 5968. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.02926

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Piezoelectricity: A Brief History of its Discovery and Physical Principles Using the Example of Low Quartz

Piezoelectricity is a key phenomenon in solid-state physics and has significant technological relevance. In teaching, however, it is often treated either without a historical context or an explicit link to the microscopic crystal structure, meaning that a crucial level of understanding remains untapped. This study combines the history of the discovery of piezoelectricity with its physical description within a didactically coherent framework. Building on the work of the brothers, Jacques and Pierre Curie (1880 - 1882), it demonstrated how investigations into pyroelectricity led to the identification of polarization induced by mechanical compression in hemihedral crystals such as tourmaline and quartz. The development from early qualitative experiments towards the first quantitative determination of piezoelectric constants is traced in a structured manner. Using low quartz as an example, the microscopic cause of piezoelectricity was attributed to the asymmetric displacements of silicon and oxygen ions within the orthosilicate ion tetrahedral network. This leads to the formation of macroscopic polarization owing to uncompensated dipole moments in the crystal lattice. The direct and reciprocal piezoelectric effects are qualitatively distinguished and discussed in the context of mechanical-electrical coupling. The article is aimed at students in physics and engineering as well as lecturers. It was conceived as a didactic review article (tutorial article) and serves as a structured introduction to the physical and historical foundations of piezoelectricity.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

$δ$-flatness and its natural extension

What, if anything, makes Minkowski spacetime a privileged local reference geometry in General Relativity? Recent work by \cite{WeatherallFletcher} argues: nothing. In response, I proposed a criterion of ``$δ$-flatness'', which bounds the magnitude of tidal acceleration within a tubular neighborhood by $δ$, and showed that Minkowski uniquely saturates the bound. Here I ask how $δ$-flatness generalises, and distinguish two kinds of extension. Reference-metric generalisations compare physical tidal acceleration with a reference tidal-force term constructed from another metric. Lorentzian signature obstructs every such comparison in which the reference fails to share the lightcones of the physical metric. Criterion modifications instead build the criterion from the physical geometry alone. The space of such modifications is wide, and I focus on those closest to $δ$-flatness, where one bounds the deviation of tidal acceleration from a non-zero target. The minimal candidate, which I call $δ$-MSS, has a singular limit that picks out the maximally symmetric spacetimes (Minkowski, de Sitter, Anti-de Sitter) via Schur's theorem. A restricted variant, which compares $g$ with a conformal rescaling of itself, either collapses to $δ$-MSS or fails to pick out a unique geometry. The chief result is that $δ$-flatness distinguishes Minkowski with no free parameter. $δ$-MSS, a weaker variant, picks out the maximally symmetric family at the cost of an externally supplied scalar.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

The Price of Removing the Scaffolding: Maxwell wrote something about Amp`ere that years later would be done to him

In the history of physics, the name scaffolding has been given to whatever served to raise a theory and is afterwards removed because, it is said, it is no longer needed. This article documents, from the originals, what it cost Maxwell's theory when that method was applied to it: what was removed from it, who did it, with what argument, and how over the years it had to be recovered because it was understood that it was needed after all. It also records what Maxwell himself missed in Amp`ere, what he calls the traces of the scaffolding: the template with which Amp`ere himself had given shape to his work.

physics.hist-ph↗