Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.03055

Seeing Less Is Not Seeing Safely: Privacy Leakage from Task-Scoped Robot Perception Exports

Abstract

Domestic robots rely on rich perception to operate in private homes, but privacy risk persists even when raw sensor data remain local. Structured representations exported to downstream planners, cloud services, logs, or learning pipelines can still reveal household information through semantics, geometry, spatial structure, and task targets. We introduce Task-Functional Perception Distillation (TFPD), a task-scoped representation-export framework that keeps rich perception local and profiles downstream exports according to task utility, direct exposure, and multiple residual inference risks. Using 120 AI2-THOR scenes with scene-disjoint train/validation/test splits, frozen attacker selection, and representation-aware held-out attacks, we evaluate navigation, collision checking, and object-goal execution. Three navigation exports achieve identical success (1.000) and mean path ratio (0.898), yet representation-level linkability ranges from 0.532 to 0.970. Replacing an explicit target label with a target region reduces target-category macro-F1 from 1.000 to 0.077 while preserving success at 0.995, while geometric coarsening reduces object-category macro-F1 from 0.704 to 0.556 at a measurable collision-utility cost. A ProcTHOR replication preserves the navigation task-equivalence/privacy-inequivalence finding while changing the relative ordering of normalized and topological exports. These results show that neither field removal nor stronger abstraction induces a universal privacy ordering and motivate task-specific, multi-risk evaluation of the complete public representation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yuqiao Xu, Erman Ayday. 2026-09-02. Seeing Less Is Not Seeing Safely: Privacy Leakage from Task-Scoped Robot Perception Exports. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03055

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

CR-VLA-Force: Learning Control-aware Compliance VLA Model for Robust Contact-rich Robotic Manipulation

Integrating visuomotor policies or Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models with force/torque (F/T) perception has demonstrated significant progress in imitation learning for robotic manipulation. However, existing force-aware VLA models frequently exhibit limited capability in precise force tracking and rapid successive adjustments. This deficiency stems from the limitations of action-chunk execution strategies and the substantial latency between perception and real-time control. Such limitations can lead to task failures and safety risks, particularly when the execution of an action chunk exerts excessive interaction forces without timely adjustment. To overcome this challenge, we propose the Control-aware Compliance VLA (CC-VLA) framework for reactive control. The CC-VLA model employs a multimodal mixture-of-experts (MoE) to encode force signal sequences and vision-language fused feature. Furthermore, it utilizes a multi-stage training strategy to ensure robust perception within the visual-semantic space and effective force perception under sparse sampling conditions. Additionally, a VLA-guided adaptive compliance controller is designed to facilitate precise position tracking during contact-free motion and optimal force-position tracking for contact-rich tasks. To facilitate high-precision F/T data acquisition, we also implement an adversaria shared teleoperation strategy for contact-rich demonstrations that bolsters system safety and interactivity. Extensive real-world experiments demonstrate that CC-VLA significantly improves success rates in challenging force-perception tasks and enhances force-control precision, while providing multi-level safety and robustness under the tested partial-OOD pose-shift settings.

cs.RO

GhostTac: Manipulating Tactile Sensors without Physical Contact

Tactile sensors are integral components of modern robotic systems, enabling robots to perceive and interact with the physical environment through tactile feedback. Despite their importance, the physical-layer security of tactile sensors has received little attention in prior work. In this paper, we present GhostTac, to the best of our knowledge, the first contactless attack that manipulates tactile sensing via electromagnetic interference (EMI). We identify that EMI exploits the nonlinear rectification and limited bandwidth amplification effects, allowing carefully crafted EMI signals to be converted into a persistent DC offset that bypasses on-board filtering and induces stable measurement deviations. Building on this mechanism, GhostTac enables fine-grained and controllable manipulation of sensor outputs by reshaping the spatial distribution and manipulating the magnitude at the targeted location. Such interference can induce unintended and harmful robot behaviors, such as causing a domestic robot to exert excessive force, resulting in physical damage or human injury. We evaluate GhostTac on 10 sensor modules and 2 dexterous hands, covering 15 tactile sensors of different types, and demonstrate consistent attack effectiveness across all tested devices. We further present three case studies on tactile grasping, slip detection, and material classification to illustrate practical impacts in real robotic tasks. We envision that our findings shed light on a new physical attack vector against tactile sensing in robotic systems.

cs.CR

The Fragility of Jailbreak Robustness Across Operational States

Existing jailbreak evaluations typically characterize robustness using a single attack success rate (ASR) measured in a default configuration (the vanilla state). However, user-LLM interactions can induce diverse operational states beyond the vanilla state. In this work, we find that jailbreak robustness is highly fragile to operational-state variation: even when the attack remains fixed, changing only an ordinary system prompt not designed to affect safety can dramatically alter attack success rates. We systematically investigate this phenomenon across seven aligned models and three representative jailbreak attacks, observing substantial differences in ASR between vanilla and non-vanilla operational states. In one case, ASR increases by up to 56 percentage points (2% to 58%) solely due to a change in operational state. Remarkably, these increases occur even for attacks originally designed and optimized under vanilla-state evaluation. We further show that state-dependent robustness variation is systematically associated with differences in hidden representations along a refusal-related axis, and that projections onto this axis strongly predict jailbreak outcomes. Our results show that a single vanilla-state evaluation may not fully characterize jailbreak robustness, motivating evaluations that also examine how robustness changes across non-vanilla operational states.

cs.CR