Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.03823

Weak rainbow saturation numbers of paths, stars and cycles

Abstract

An edge-colored graph is \emph{rainbow} if all of its edges receive distinct colors. For a fixed graph $H$, an edge-colored graph $F$ is called weakly $H$-rainbow saturated if there exists an ordering $e_1,e_2,\ldots,e_{|E(\bar{F})|}$ of $E(\bar{F})$ such that, for any edge coloring $c$ of $E(\bar{F})$ with $c(e_i)\neq c(e_j)$, there is always a rainbow copy of $H$ that contains $e_i$ in $F+\{e_1,e_2,\ldots,e_i\}$. The \emph{weak rainbow saturation number} $\operatorname{rwsat}(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in a weakly $H$-rainbow saturated graph on $n$ vertices. Li, Ma, and Xie [JGT, 2025] showed that $\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{\operatorname{rwsat}(n,H)}{n}$ exists for every nonempty graph $H$. Paths and stars attain, respectively, the minimum and maximum ordinary weak saturation numbers among all trees of the same order. We determine their weak rainbow saturation numbers exactly. For all $\ell>30$, we show that $$ \ell+1=\s(n,P_\ell)< \s(n,S_\ell)=\binom{\ell}{2}-1$$ where $P_\ell$ and $S_\ell$ denote the path and star on $\ell$ vertices, respectively. Thus, their dependence on $\ell$ is linear for paths and quadratic for stars. We then focus on cycles. Li, Ma, and Xie asked whether $\operatorname{rwsat}(n,C_\ell)$ has leading term $\frac32n$ for every $\ell\ge4$. We answer this question negatively by giving an explicit construction showing that, for every $\ell\ge4$ and all sufficiently large $n$, $$\s(n,C_\ell)< \frac{\ell}{\ell-1}n+c_\ell,$$ where $c_\ell$ depends only on $\ell$. Since $\frac{\ell}{\ell-1}<\frac32$, this strictly improves the proposed leading coefficient for every cycle $C_\ell$ with $\ell\ge4$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiawen Bo, Xiaopan Lian, Jianing Liu. 2026-09-03. Weak rainbow saturation numbers of paths, stars and cycles. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.03823

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO