Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.06509

Revisiting dependence in multiple testing: empirical distribution approaches for FDP control

Fangyong Zheng·Pengfei Li·Yuan Jiang·Tao Yu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Large-scale multiple hypothesis testing is central to the analysis of high-throughput data, where controlling false discoveries is critical. Classical procedures typically rely on theoretical null distributions and often adjust for dependence among test statistics, but these approaches may be misleading when the empirical distribution of null statistics deviates from theoretical assumptions. Motivated by this observation, we investigate the role of the empirical cumulative distribution function (c.d.f.) of null test statistics in controlling the false discovery proportion (FDP). We first show that, under an oracle scenario where the empirical c.d.f. of the test statistics for all null hypotheses is known, FDP control can be achieved optimally regardless of the dependence structure, highlighting that explicit modeling of dependence may be unnecessary. Building on this insight, we propose an empirical c.d.f.-based FDP control (eFDP) method, implemented via a multivariate mixture model framework and a nonparametric estimation procedure for the empirical c.d.f.s, establish its asymptotic convergence, and construct an FDP control procedure that achieves asymptotic FDP control. Extensive simulations demonstrate that eFDP attains more accurate FDP control and higher power than existing approaches, particularly under strong dependence, and analysis of a high-dimensional breast cancer gene expression dataset confirms its practical utility.

Explore related subjects

stat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fangyong Zheng, Pengfei Li, Yuan Jiang, Tao Yu. 2026-09-06. Revisiting dependence in multiple testing: empirical distribution approaches for FDP control. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06509

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME↗
arXiv2026

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME↗