arXiv · 2609.07079
Comparing Self-Supervised and Domain-Invariant Features for Cross-Domain Voice Phishing Detection
Abstract
Voice phishing detection faces three critical challenges: real criminal recordings are unavailable due to privacy constraints; when available, only a handful of samples exist, insufficient for fine-tuning; and lightweight acoustic-only detection is needed as an alternative to large self-supervised models. We compare domain-invariant prosodic features and self-supervised representations (HuBERT, wav2vec2.0) through cross-domain evaluation-training on scenario-based actor recordings and testing on authentic criminal calls. Domain-invariant prosodic features achieve 69.5% F1 zero-shot and 71.0% with 5-shot learning. HuBERT achieves highest performance (94.2% F1, 5-shot), while wav2vec2.0 exhibits a precision-oriented detection profile (90.2% F1 with 99.4% precision, 5-shot). These findings reveal fundamental trade-offs: domain-invariant features enable zero-shot deployment when no real data exists, while SSL methods achieve higher performance but require real samples and compute.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Jeongmin Lee, Seung Yun, Minkyu Lee, Ran Han, Yoonkyu Woo, Jinxia Huang. 2026-09-07. Comparing Self-Supervised and Domain-Invariant Features for Cross-Domain Voice Phishing Detection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07079
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
Discover connections
Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.