Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.08092

A Bounded Finite-One Degree Whose One-One Degrees Form Exactly a Dense Linear Order

Abstract

We construct a set $U\leq_T\emptyset''$ whose bounded finite-one degree, ordered internally by one-one reducibility, consists exactly of a countable dense linear order without endpoints. More precisely, \[ \left( \{[B]_1:B\equiv_{\mathrm{bfo}}U\},\leq_1 \right) \cong (\mathbb Q,\leq). \] This exact realization contrasts with two previous results. In earlier work, a bounded finite-one degree was constructed that contains a copy of $(\mathbb Q,\leq)$, but the same degree also contains an infinite antichain of one-one degrees and, more generally, embedded copies of all countable partial orders; thus the dense chain does not exhaust the degree. In a different direction, $m$-rigidity yields an almost-sure and comeager obstruction: for a measure-$1$ and comeager class of sets, the corresponding bounded finite-one degree contains an infinite antichain of one-one degrees and hence is not linearly ordered. The present construction shows that, despite this typical negative behaviour, exact dense linear order can occur. In particular, it gives an affirmative answer to Open Question~3 of Richter, Stephan, and Zhang. The proof has two main parts. A block homogenization construction produces a noncylindrical set $U$, a weak dyadic tower $(U_e)_{e\in\mathbb N}$, computable reservoirs of both colours, and a base absorption property. An abstract absorption-to-exhaustivity theorem then shows that every member of the bounded finite-one degree of $U$ is one-one equivalent to some finite autojoin $mU_e$, thereby yielding the exhaustive classification above.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Patrizio Cintioli. 2026-09-08. A Bounded Finite-One Degree Whose One-One Degrees Form Exactly a Dense Linear Order. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08092

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO