Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.08760

Set-valued tableaux and cells of Gelfand-Zetlin polytopes

Evgeny Smirnov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Two combinatorial rules are known for the Grassmannian Grothendieck polynomial $G^{(β)}_λ$: a sum over set-valued tableaux of shape $λ$, due to Buch, and a sum over the efficient cells of a cellular decomposition of the Gelfand-Zetlin polytope $GZ(λ)$, due to E. Presnova and the author. All coefficients in both sums equal $1$. We construct an explicit bijection between the two indexing sets which matches the summands term by term, carrying the number of excess entries of a tableau to the dimension of the corresponding cell; in particular the two rules are equivalent, either being deducible from the other. The efficiency condition on cells turns out to be the column-strictness of tableaux. We then transport Yu's square-root crystal operators to the cells and find that they respect dimension, along a double $i$-string the cells alternate between two consecutive dimensions, but not incidence: consecutive cells of such a string need not share a point, already for $λ=(2,1,0)$.

Explore related subjects

math.COmath.AG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Evgeny Smirnov. 2026-09-11. Set-valued tableaux and cells of Gelfand-Zetlin polytopes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08760

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO↗