Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.09204

Counting Type I and Type II solutions of the Erdos-Straus equation: concentration, local obstructions, and a pointwise comparison

Abstract

For a prime p >= 5 let f_I(p) and f_II(p) count the Type I and Type II solutions of the Erdos-Straus equation 4/p = 1/x + 1/y + 1/z, in the sense of Elsholtz and Tao. We do not address the Erdos-Straus conjecture itself; our subject is the number of solutions. We turn a bijection of Bradford into an exact counting identity: f_I(p) and f_II(p) are sums, over the denominators n coprime to p, of the number of divisors of n^2 in a single residue class modulo e_n = 4n - p. A dual identity puts both counts on the same integer and the same modulus, distinguished only by the classes -p and -1. Our main unconditional result holds for every numerator m: the number of Type II solutions of m/p = 1/x + 1/(pY) + 1/(pZ) with Y <= K is at most sum_{n <= K} tau(n) = K log K + O(K), uniformly in p and m; on average over p <= N it is only O_m((log K)^3 log log K). Hence Type II solutions concentrate at x/p -> 1/m, while Type I solutions cannot. The numerator carries arithmetic information in two independent ways. A real character chi modulo e_n that is trivial on the primes dividing n annihilates Type II when chi(-1) = -1, and Type I when chi(-1)chi(m_0) = -1, where m_0 is the squarefree kernel of m; these coincide exactly when m is a square, so for the numerator 4 no criterion modulo squares can separate the two types. Separately, f_I(n) = f_II(n) = 0 for every odd perfect square n whenever 4 divides m, generalising a theorem of Elsholtz and Tao. Finally we prove the sharp local inequality 2B(n) >= A(n) for e_n in {1,3,5}, with a construction showing it fails for every odd e with 7 <= e <= 2*10^4; we conjecture f_I(p) > f_II(p) for all p > 5 with p not congruent to 1 mod 8, verify this for p <= 10^6, and reduce it to a finite window. We also locate exactly the factor log log N in the Elsholtz-Tao upper bound for the sum of f_I(p).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xinyang Jiang. 2026-09-13. Counting Type I and Type II solutions of the Erdos-Straus equation: concentration, local obstructions, and a pointwise comparison. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09204

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Proof of Liu's Conjecture on the Fundamental Triangle Inequality

Let $a,b,c$ be the side lengths of a triangle, and let $R$ and $r$ denote its circumradius and inradius, respectively. Liu proposed the conjecture \[ \sum_{\text{cyc}} \left(\frac{a(b+c-a)}{bc}\right)^k \ge 2+\left(\frac{2r}{R}\right)^k,\qquad k>1, \] with the reverse inequality for $k<1$. We prove this conjecture by reducing it to an algebraic inequality for three positive variables with prescribed sum and product. We also determine the equality cases.

math.GM

A quadratic critical-value conjecture for the fifth Bessel moment

We conjecture an explicit evaluation of the pure fifth Bessel moment $\int_0^\infty K_0(t)^5\,dt$ as a quadratic expression in the critical value $L(f,2)$ of the weight-three, level-60 newform $f$ (LMFDB orbit 60.3.b.a) identified in the twisted fifth-moment modularity theorem of Lim, Tu and Yu, with coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})$ and the square taken before the real and imaginary parts. Directed interval computations, using no stored Bessel or $L$-values, bound the absolute discrepancy by $10^{-358}$. We prove three exact modular identities for $f$: the Petersson-norm formula $\langle f,f\rangle_{60} = \frac{3(5-\sqrt{5})}{2π^4}|L(f,2)|^2$, the coefficient-conjugation relation $L(f^σ,2) = κL(f,2)$ with explicit $κ\in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5},i)$, and the twisted symmetric-square evaluation $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2) = \sqrt{15}\,π^2 \langle f,f\rangle_{60}$, together with $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,3) = π^4\langle f,f\rangle_{60}/8$, in the full Euler-factor normalization of Lim, Tu and Yu. The last identity shows that the companion norm conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = \frac{3\sqrt{15}(5-\sqrt{5})}{2}|L(f,2)|^2$ is equivalent to the symmetric-square conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = π^2 L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2)$ of Lim, Tu and Yu, while the exact relation $D_{5,\mathrm{even}} = π^2 D_{5,\mathrm{odd}}/(2\sqrt{15})$ follows from Chuang's period formulas. Every Bessel-to-modular equality, including the individual-period formula, remains conjectural. Complete proofs, exact rational certificates and verification programs are included as ancillary files.

math.GM