Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.11323

Polynomial positivity cones for Coxeter roots and walks in trees

Abstract

For a finite simple graph $G$ and an integer $k\ge0$, let $w_k(G)$ denote the number of walks of length $k$. We prove the conjecture of Täubig, Weihmann, Kosub, Hemmecke, and Mayr for every finite tree and determine all equality cases. If $T$ has $n\ge1$ vertices, then $n w_{k+1}(T)-2(n-1)w_k(T)\ge0$ for every $k\ge1$; for $n\ge3$, equality holds if and only if $T$ is a star and $k$ is even, whereas for $n=1$ or $n=2$, equality holds for every $k\ge1$. For non-Dynkin trees and even indices, the proof is based on a polynomial positivity cone associated with the adjacency operator of a finite graph and a positive real root of its simply-laced Coxeter system. For finite connected bipartite non-Dynkin graphs, we establish sufficient positivity conditions in terms of Coxeter orbits and inversion sets, and verify these conditions for indicator roots supported on connected induced subtrees. For non-Dynkin trees, this yields the rooted even-index inequality and, after summation, the corresponding global inequality. We also prove that if $G$ is a finite connected bipartite non-Dynkin simple graph, $\varnothing\ne U\subseteq V(G)$, and the subgraph of $G$ induced by $U$ is a tree, then $|U|w_{k+1}(G,U)-2(|U|-1)w_k(G,U)\ge0$ for every $k\ge0$, where $w_k(G,U)$ counts the length-$k$ walks in $G$ whose initial and terminal vertices lie in $U$; the intermediate vertices are unrestricted. The remaining even-index cases for finite Dynkin trees are handled by generating-function recurrences, while the odd-index cases follow from a spectral covariance identity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dongxiu Cai, Zhenbo Chen, Jiasheng Zeng, Xiao-Dong Zhang. 2026-09-10. Polynomial positivity cones for Coxeter roots and walks in trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11323

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On Perfect Divisibility of Bull-Free Graphs Without Long Paths

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory \textbf{90} (2019) 54-60] proved that every ($P_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible, while Chen and Xu [Discrete Appl. Math. \textbf{372} (2025) 298-307] proved the same for ($P_7,C_5$, bull)-free graphs. We extend these results by proving that every ($P_8,C_5$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible and that, letting $F$ denote the Grötzsch graph, a ($P_6$, bull)-free graph is perfectly divisible if and only if it is $F$-free.

math.CO

Covering graphs by isometric trees

A connected subgraph of a graph is isometric if it preserves distances. Recently, graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of isometric paths have been studied. In this paper, we consider the analogous problem for isometric trees, focusing on the treewidth of graphs admitting a vertex or edge covering by a small number of such trees. Baste, De Meyer, Giocanti, Objois, and Picavet showed that for coverings by two isometric trees, the treewidth is bounded. We show that already for three isometric trees, the treewidth can be linear in the number of vertices. On the positive side, we show that for graphs of bounded degree coverable by a small number of isometric trees, the treewidth is sublinear in the number of vertices.

math.CO

Tree-independence number of $P_5$-free graphs with no large bicliques

The tree-independence number of a graph is the minimum, over all tree-decompositions of the graph, of the maximum size of an independent set contained in a bag. Graph classes of bounded tree-independence number have strong structural and algorithmic properties; however, the parameter can be unbounded even in quite restricted classes. In particular, the presence of an induced biclique $K_{\ell,\ell}$ forces tree-independence number at least $\ell$. This leads to the question whether large induced bicliques are the only obstruction to bounded tree-independence number in natural hereditary classes. A conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht states that for all positive integers $t$ and $\ell$, ${\{P_t,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs have bounded tree-independence number. We prove this conjecture for ${t=5}$ by showing that every ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graph has tree-independence number at most ${4\ell-4}$. We also obtain related bounds for the weaker parameter of $α$-degeneracy and answer a question of Hilaire, Milanič, and Vasić whether tree-independence number of ${\{P_5,K_{\ell,\ell}\}}$-free graphs exceeds $\ell$ by at most an additive constant.

math.CO