Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.15711

Model-Free PID Tuning by Step-Response Inspection

Abstract

Industrial PID loops are still tuned by hand: step the setpoint, look at the response, change a gain. This paper turns that procedure into an algorithm, SPIN, for Step-response Phase-portrait INspection. From a single closed-loop step response we form three phase portraits of the control deviation and count how many times each trajectory winds around its settling point. The counts are dimensionless and independent of the step size and of the clock. They show which channel is under-damped: integral, proportional, or derivative. A triangular rule reads the three counts, cutting the gain of the one band whose fault is certain and raising that of every band the same test shows to be within its limit. No model is identified and no optimization is solved. The iteration is deterministic and its gains stay inside a fixed box. Because a ringing count is itself the evidence that the loop is in the regime where cutting that band's gain reduces the count, the iteration settles into a cycle at the edge of the well-damped set. It needs no excitation beyond a routine setpoint step, so it can run on a process in operation, and it may start from arbitrary gains, including destabilizing ones. SPIN assumes a stable, self-regulating process whose gain and phase both fall with frequency, which covers the lag-plus-dead-time models common in process control, and a controller from the nested family $\mathrm{I} \subset \mathrm{PI} \subset \mathrm{PID}$ with integral action present. We validate it on a battery of process-typical plants with one fixed step size and one set of dimensionless constants throughout. Every decision is visible: the operator sees what the algorithm sees. A reference implementation and an interactive demonstration are public.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel Pachner, Pavel Otta, Jiří Dostál, Vladimír Havlena. 2026-09-14. Model-Free PID Tuning by Step-Response Inspection. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.15711

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Constrained Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems via Approximate HJB and Control Barrier Functions

This paper presents a two-stage framework for constrained feedback control of input-affine nonlinear systems. Offline, an approximate value function for the unconstrained problem is computed, for example using Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman (HJB)-based policy iteration. Online, the proposed quadratic program (QP) minimizes the pre-Hamiltonian evaluated using the approximate value-function gradient subject to safety constraints enforced by control barrier functions (CBFs). This architecture decouples performance optimization from constraint enforcement, allowing constraints to be modified without recomputing the value function. As in CBF-QP architectures based on control Lyapunov functions (CLFs), safety is enforced as a hard constraint; however, the performance objective targets approximate optimality rather than a prescribed Lyapunov decay. Numerical results on a linear 2-state hovercraft and a nonlinear 9-state spacecraft attitude-control problem show agreement with the constrained open-loop optimal control problem (OCP) benchmark in the linear case, and performance close to the OCP benchmark, improving on CLF-based controllers, in the nonlinear case.

eess.SY

Rao-Blackwellized Stein Gradient Descent for Joint State-Parameter Estimation

We present a filtering framework for online joint state estimation and parameter identification in nonlinear, time-varying systems. The algorithm uses a Rao-Blackwellization technique to infer joint state-parameter posteriors efficiently. In particular, conditional state distributions are computed analytically via Kalman filtering, while model parameters, including the measurement-noise covariance, are approximated using particle-based Stein Variational Gradient Descent (SVGD), enabling stable real-time inference. To handle parameters subject to physical constraints, we further introduce constrained variants that enforce them through an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) splitting of the SVGD update, including nonlinear equality constraints that standard particle filters cannot readily handle. We derive a stability bound that relates the approximation error in the parameter posterior to the resulting error in the marginal state distribution. Performance of the proposed filters is validated on three case studies: a fed-batch bioreactor with Haldane kinetics and a damped pendulum, both under physical constraints, and a neural-network-augmented dynamic system. The examples cover parameter estimation under inequality and equality constraints and online neural-network training within a dynamical model.

eess.SY

Firing Rate Neural Network Implementations of Model Predictive Control

Human and animal brains perform planning to enable complex movements and behaviors, a process that can be effectively described using model predictive control (MPC). How could the brain physically implement MPC? In this work, we translate model predictive controllers into firing rate neural networks, offering insights into the nonlinear neural dynamics that underpin planning. We propose a constructive method; no training is required. This is done first applying the projected gradient method to the dual problem to derive a baseline neural network implementation. We then use factorization and contraction analysis to systematically generate alternative network architectures; in other words, we systematically generate hypotheses for how planning is done in the brain via neural dynamics. Finally, we present numerical simulations to study different neural networks performing MPC to balance an inverted pendulum on a cart (i.e., balancing a stick on a hand), including one example in which imposing sparse connectivity (a property observed in brain networks) does not degrade control performance.

eess.SY