Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.16005

Automated Comment Moderation Enhances Social Media Advertising Performance

Jiwoon Park·Julian De Freitas
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Social media advertising exposes brands not only to potential customers but also to unfiltered consumer discourse in the form of user comments. While comments can enhance authenticity and engagement, they also introduce reputational risks through spam, hate speech, and negative user-generated content. Despite the increasing prevalence of AI-powered comment moderation solutions, little causal evidence exists on whether moderation (i.e., hiding harmful comments) improves ad effectiveness. Across six empirical studies-including two large-scale field experiments and four online studies-we demonstrate that automated moderation of harmful comments causally improves ad performance, including conversion rates, return on ad spend, and purchase intentions. We also identify two important platform-governance boundary conditions: the gains from moderation depend on whether the platform is transparent about the brand's moderation behavior, and what types of comments are moderated. At the same time, the moderation effect persists when the brand is transparent about its own moderation practices. We advance theory on context effects in social media advertising, by uncovering the first targeted, preventative intervention for avoiding negative adjacencies. For managers, the results show that AI-assisted comment moderation impacts real ad performance but may be contingent upon platform-level transparency design.

Explore related subjects

cs.SIcs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jiwoon Park, Julian De Freitas. 2026-07-29. Automated Comment Moderation Enhances Social Media Advertising Performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why Does Misinformation Propagate Faster? An Algorithmic Perspective on X

Misinformation is widely reported to propagate faster on engagement-based platforms, yet prior work largely focused on empirical analysis, without identifying a specific algorithmic mechanism that results in this phenomenon. Thanks to the open-sourcing of X's recommendation algorithms, we conduct what is, to our knowledge, the first component-level study of the recommendation algorithm deployed by a social media platform, which examines how each of its components affects misinformation propagation. Specifically, we identify the engagement fungibility mechanism in the algorithm, where the final recommendation score is constructed as a weighted sum of all predicted user activities. As a result, a tweet can be repeatedly recommended simply because it is predicted to draw many instant reactions (e.g., likes and retweets), even when it is not expected to draw thoughtful responses (e.g., replies and quotes). Since misinformation typically draws a larger share of its engagement from instant reactions, this mechanism enables it to receive more recommendation exposure and to propagate faster. To empirically validate this mechanism, we re-implement X's recommendation algorithm on the USC X 2024 election corpus, and build a calibrated simulation study to analyze the impact of different scoring rules. We find that re-tuning the metric weights has little or even a negative impact on reducing the credibility exposure gap, while those scoring rules that set a precondition of thoughtful engagement for amplification would be able to alleviate the gap significantly, across 46 robustness checks. Our diagnosis, therefore, yields a simple and deployable fix, a reflective-threshold gate that withholds amplification until a tweet is predicted to draw thoughtful engagement, which we find to reallocate exposure away from low-credibility content at no cost to mainstream exposure and with no loss of engagement.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

The Conversation Turns First: Crowd Discussion and Price Reversals in Prediction Markets

Prediction markets combine trading with public discussion of the same events. We examine whether comment-derived signals predict subsequent activity, buying direction, and changes in the leading outcome. A correlation sweep across 79 non-political Polymarket markets guides six classification experiments comparing comment features, trading features, and their combinations. On live blocks containing comments, attention nearly matches trading history in predicting heavy trading within 18 hours (PR-AUC 0.786 versus 0.790, against prevalence 0.606), with its relative advantage concentrated in short markets. Comment content carries directional information: toxicity ranks future buying direction above chance in 43 of 53 scored markets, while adding attention, sentiment, and stance to flow history increases ROC-AUC from 0.780 to 0.788. Leadership changes are predicted primarily by market state. Stance shifts against the leader before reversals in 23 of 27 evaluable markets, but adds no clear improvement in individual-block forecasting. These results distinguish attention from directional support and price uncertainty. They establish predictive associations consistent with discussion and trading responding to shared information, without identifying a causal effect of comments on markets.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Deep-learning-aided dismantling of interdependent networks

Identifying the minimal set of nodes whose removal breaks a complex network apart, also referred as the network dismantling problem, is a highly non-trivial task with applications in multiple domains. Whereas network dismantling has been extensively studied over the past decade, research has primarily focused on the formulations of the optimization problem for single-layer networks, neglecting that many, if not all, real networks display multiple layers of interdependent interactions. In such networks, the optimization problem is fundamentally different as the effect of removing nodes propagates within and across layers in a way that can not be predicted using a single-layer perspective. Here, we propose a dismantling algorithm named MultiDismantler, which leverages multiplex network representation and deep reinforcement learning to optimally dismantle multi-layer interdependent networks. MultiDismantler is trained on small synthetic multiplex graphs; when applied to large, real and synthetic networks, it displays exceptional dismantling performance, clearly outperforming all existing methods that rely on a single-layer approach to network dismantling. We show that MultiDismantler is effective in guiding strategies for the containment of diseases in social networks characterized by multiple layers of social interactions. Also, we show that MultiDismantler is useful in the design of protocols aimed at delaying the onset of cascading failures in interdependent critical infrastructures.

cs.SI↗