Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.17864

On two forms in many variables of different degrees

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate integral solutions satisfying the system of two forms in many variables of different degrees. Let $d_1$ and $d_2$ be natural numbers with $d_2>d_1\geq 2$. Let $F_{i}(\boldsymbol{x}) \ (i=1,2)$ be forms in $n$ variables of degrees $d_i\ (i=1,2)$, respectively. Define $$N(\boldsymbol{F};P):=\#\{\boldsymbol{x}\in [-P,P]^n\cap \mathbb{Z}^n:\ F_{i}(\boldsymbol{x})=0\ (i=1,2)\}.$$ When each dimension of singular loci of $F_1=0$ and $F_2=0$ is small, we obtain a number $n_0:=n_0(\boldsymbol{F})$ such that whenever $n> n_0$ one has the expected asymptotic formula \begin{equation*} N(\boldsymbol{F};P)=c_{\boldsymbol{F}}\cdot P^{n-d_1-d_2}+O(P^{n-d_1-d_2-δ}),\ \text{for some }δ>0, \end{equation*} where the constant $c_{\boldsymbol{F}}$ is the product of local densities. We note that this asymptotic formula agrees with the Manin-Peyre conjecture. Compared to the previous work, we lower the admissible threshold $n_0(\boldsymbol{F})$ in most cases, with the exception of case $d_2-d_1=1$. In particular, if $F_1$ and $F_2$ are non-singular forms, then we obtain $$n_0(\boldsymbol{F})=3(d_2-1)2^{d_2-1}+(d_1-1)2^{d_1},$$ provided that $d_2\geq 5d_1$ with $d_1\geq2$. This yields a substantial improvement over the previous bound $n_0(\boldsymbol{F})=(d_1+2)(d_2-1)2^{d_2-1}+d_12^{d_1-1}$. To achieve this, we develop a new differencing argument together with the van der Corput differencing argument, delivering an efficient upper-bound estimate for mean values of exponential sums associated with two forms in many variables of different degrees, when the difference between degrees is sufficiently large. Furthermore, the method described in this paper is flexible enough to apply to forms in many variables of differing degrees in general.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kiseok Yeon. 2026-09-15. On two forms in many variables of different degrees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17864

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT