Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.18522

Periodicity conjectures for all 2-sumfree sequences

Abstract

Complementing an earlier paper, which focused on $3$-sumfree sequences, we here consider only $2$-sumfree sequences: starting with positive integers $f$ and $g>f$, the infinite, increasing 2-sumfree sequence $S_{f,g}$ is constructed as follows. After any initial segment, the next entry is the smallest positive integer exceeding all previous ones that differs from all sums of distinct pairs in the sequence. It follows from a theorem in the previous paper that for every $f\geq 1$ and all $f+1\leq g<2f$ the sequence $S_{f,g}$ exhibits ultimately periodic behaviour. In this paper we state precise conjectures that, if true, would imply that every $2$-sumfree sequence is ultimately periodic. Here periodicity of an increasing sequence is understood to mean periodicity of the sequence of first differences, or, equivalently, of its characteristic sequence. We supply much computational evidence to support the conjectures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daan van Berkel, Wieb Bosma. 2026-09-16. Periodicity conjectures for all 2-sumfree sequences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18522

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT