Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.19000

Capability Emergence Can Be Forecast: Per-Seed, In Advance, With Calibrated Intervals, Certified False Alarms, and a Blind Pre-Registered Gate

Gunner Levi Howe
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Emergent capabilities are widely treated as unpredictable: loss improves smoothly while abilities appear abruptly. Prior work offers early-warning indicators but never scores them as forecasts: no lead time at controlled false-alarm rate, no calibration, no negatives, no blind tests. We supply that discipline and show that, in grokking model systems and small language models, emergence timing is forecastable per run, in advance, with calibrated uncertainty. Across 30 transformers at identical configuration, the formation time of the previous-token head forecasts each seed's induction-head emergence at Spearman rho=0.977 with median lead 975 steps (~15% of training); a best-case loss rule ties the ranking with 50-step lead (a nowcast). Conformal intervals covered 15/15 held-out seeds, and the frozen rule passed blind pre-registered gates on TWO never-seen configurations (10/10 and 9/10 coverage). A trap-language rung then attacked our own rule as pre-registered: where previous-token context pays for the task itself, the bare precursor false-alarms on 10/10 capability-blocked runs, while the mechanism-composed conjunction is certified in both language classes (0 false alarms) and times emergence at rho=1.000. Finally, a gap-origin study broke the fixed offset (both lr and batch move the gap ~2.3x; no external clock owns it) and revealed the law beneath: across 80 valid-anchor runs the anchor fires at 0.843 of time-to-emergence -- t_event ~= 1.19 x t_anchor -- and this multiplicative rule passed its own blind gate (5/5) at a third unseen configuration. False alarms are certified against 33 manufactured negatives. The precursor leads across 3 public model families (Pythia, OLMo, OLMo-2; 7 suites), with OLMo-2 at 1B tokens showing precursor formed, capability absent. Four pre-registered kill criteria fired and are reported. Every freeze precedes its data in a public commit chain.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gunner Levi Howe. 2026-07-17. Capability Emergence Can Be Forecast: Per-Seed, In Advance, With Calibrated Intervals, Certified False Alarms, and a Blind Pre-Registered Gate. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19000

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Analysis of Regularized Learning in Banach Spaces for Linear-functional Data

This article delves into the study of the theory of regularized learning in Banach spaces for linear-functional data. It encompasses discussions on representer theorems, pseudo-approximation theorems, and convergence theorems. Regularized learning is designed to minimize regularized empirical risks over a Banach space. The empirical risks are calculated by utilizing training data and multi-loss functions. The input training data are composed of linear functionals in a predual space of the Banach space to capture discrete local information from multimodal data and multiscale models. Through the regularized learning, approximations of the exact solution to an unidentified or uncertain original problem are globally achieved. In the convergence theorems, the convergence of the approximate solutions to the exact solution is established through the utilization of the weak* topology of the Banach space. The theorems of regularized learning are utilized in the interpretation of classical machine learning, such as support vector machines and artificial neural networks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On Minimal Depth in Neural Networks

Understanding the relationship between the depth of a neural network and its representational capacity is a central problem in deep learning theory. In this work, we develop a geometric framework to analyze the expressivity of ReLU networks with the notion of depth complexity for convex polytopes. The depth of a polytope recursively quantifies the number of alternating convex hull and Minkowski sum operations required to construct it. This geometric perspective serves as a rigorous tool for deriving depth lower bounds and understanding the structural limits of deep neural architectures. We establish lower and upper bounds on the depth of polytopes, as well as tight bounds for classical families. These results yield two main consequences. First, we provide a purely geometric proof of the expressivity bound by Arora et al. (2018), confirming that $\lceil \log_2(n+1)\rceil$ hidden layers suffice to represent any continuous piecewise linear (CPWL) function. Second, we prove that, unlike general ReLU networks, convex polytopes do not admit a universal depth bound. Specifically, the depth of cyclic polytopes in dimensions $n \geq 4$ grows unboundedly with the number of vertices. This result implies that Input Convex Neural Networks (ICNNs) cannot represent all convex CPWL functions with a fixed depth, revealing a sharp separation in expressivity between ICNNs and standard ReLU networks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

DeepSPoC: A Deep Learning Based Sequential Propagation of Chaos

Classical particle methods based on propagation of chaos (PoC) have been developed for solving mean-field stochastic differential equations and their associated nonlinear Fokker--Planck equations. However, direct PoC implementations are difficult to apply to high-dimensional problems because they require simulating and storing large numbers of interacting particles, often with high particle-particle interaction costs. Motivated by these limitations, we build on the recently proposed sequential propagation of chaos (SPoC) framework, which replaces the fully interacting particle system in PoC with a sequential interaction mechanism. Based on this structure, we present DeepSPoC, a neural particle method that embeds a neural density representation into the sequential particle dynamics. DeepSPoC simulates particles batch by batch, while the neural network represents the evolving empirical law and is substituted into the coefficients of the mean-field SDE, thereby replacing direct particle-particle interactions with particle-network interactions. In DeepSPoC, a recently developed normalizing flow model called KRnet is used to approximate the empirical measure of particles. Compared with direct particle implementations, DeepSPoC substantially reduces memory consumption and evaluates interaction terms more efficiently, thereby improving scalability for high-dimensional problems. We apply DeepSPoC to a wide range of mean-field equations and verify its effectiveness and computational advantages.

cs.LG↗