Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.19393

WZPlanner: Safe End-to-End Path Planning for Autonomous Driving in Work Zones

Nishad Sahu·Changzhong Qian·Guangzhou Cai·Shounak Sural·Ragunathan·Rajkumar
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Work zones alter lane geometry through temporary traffic controls and closures that may be absent from on-board maps, challenging autonomous vehicle (AV) perception and planning. Generalization is also limited by scarce public datasets with structured geometric supervision. We present WorkZonePlan, a dataset comprising 149K+ synthetic and 5K+ real-world multimodal samples with 3D annotations for lane boundaries, work zone boundaries, and driving trajectory options. It also provides 76 closed-loop CARLA scenarios replayed under three weather conditions, yielding 228 Bench2Drive-format evaluation routes. We introduce WAVE (Work-zone-focused AV data generation in Virtual and rEal Environments), a semi-automated pipeline for creating the dataset, and BoundaryFormer (BF), a transformer-based model that jointly predicts lane and work zone boundary polynomials and driving trajectories. BF uses slot attention for boundary prediction. Ablations show that a separate trajectory decoder using boundary slot features substantially improves trajectory prediction over a slot-attention-only approach. Building on this finding, BF++ offers Camera and Camera+LiDAR variants with metric ground-plane encoding, typed boundary/trajectory queries, long-range point anchors, image-space curve refinement, and conservative gated LiDAR fusion. On the 211 routes common to all four models at the evaluation freeze, BF++-Camera and BF++-Camera+LiDAR achieve Driving Scores of 63.0 and 64.4, respectively, compared with 59.3 for SimLingo and 26.1 for TransFuser++ (TF++). BF++ is 40 times smaller than SimLingo and more than 10 times smaller than TF++, while achieving higher Driving Scores. These results support jointly predicting lane boundaries, work zone boundaries, and driving trajectories as a promising direction toward safer AV operation in work zones. Code and dataset: https://github.com/Nishad-Sahu/WZPlanner.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nishad Sahu, Changzhong Qian, Guangzhou Cai, Shounak Sural, Ragunathan, Rajkumar. 2026-09-16. WZPlanner: Safe End-to-End Path Planning for Autonomous Driving in Work Zones. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19393

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗