Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.20881

On the Word-Representability of Tensor Product Graphs

Abstract

Word-representable graphs are a class of graphs that can be represented by words, where edges and non-edges are determined by the alternation of letters in those words. The tensor product $G \times H$ (also known as the direct product or Kronecker product) is one of the four standard graph products. Problem 7.2.5 in Kitaev and Lozin's book \emph{Words and Graphs} (Springer, 2015) raised three open questions regarding the word-representability of tensor products. Despite extensive research on word-representable graphs, the word-representability of tensor products seems to have received no attention. This paper not only answers 2.5 of the questions posed by Kitaev and Lozin in Problem 7.2.5, but also initiates a systematic study, focusing on four fundamental families: wheel graphs $W_n$, complete graphs $K_n$, the Mycielskian of the cycle graph $μ_n$, and the extended Mycielskian of the cycle graph $μ'_n$. Among our main results, we prove that $W_{2n} \times G$, $μ_{2n} \times G$, and $μ'_{2n} \times G$ are always word-representable for any graph $G$; that $K_n \times K_m$ is word-representable if and only if $\min\{n,m\} \leq 3$; and that tensor products $G \times H$ containing $W_{2n+1} \times W_{2m+1}$ or $μ_{2n+1} \times μ_{2m+1}$ or $μ'_{2n+1} \times μ'_{2m+1}$ as induced subgraphs are non-word-representable. Our proofs exploit the hereditary nature of non-word-representability and the presence of non-comparability neighbourhoods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nawaf Alshammari. 2026-09-16. On the Word-Representability of Tensor Product Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20881

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO