arXiv · 2609.21247
When Does Reasoning Help in Machine Translation? A Hierarchical Analysis of LRM Reasoning Traces
Abstract
Large Reasoning Models increasingly use intermediate traces for machine translation, but it remains unclear when such reasoning helps or hurts. We analyze reasoning traces across models, languages, domains, and datasets, focusing on reasoning language, length, and structure. We find that the best reasoning language is model-specific, reasoning length has a non-monotonic relationship with quality, and traces exhibit recurring functional patterns. To uncover these patterns, we introduce Hierarchical Meta-Summarization (HMS), a scalable framework that induces coarse- and fine-grained reasoning structures without predefined taxonomies. HMS reveals a shared organization--understanding/planning, translating/drafting, and refining/verifying--alongside domain-specific variation. Our results suggest that MT reasoning should be controlled in a model-aware, length-aware, and pattern-aware manner rather than uniformly encouraged.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Yuxiang Liu, Jiaming Luo, Eleftheria Briakou, Colin Cherry. 2026-09-18. When Does Reasoning Help in Machine Translation? A Hierarchical Analysis of LRM Reasoning Traces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.21247
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.