arXiv · 2609.22159
The Limit and Its Ground. QBism, Scientific Realism, and the Born Rule
Abstract
QBists insist that theirs is a realist position while denying that the quantum formalism represents a mind-independent world. The insistence is hard to place. The realism debate is throughout a dispute about represented content, so a theory that denies standing in the representation relation appears not to take up a position within that debate at all. This paper examines the most developed attempt to make good on the QBist claim--David Glick's perspectival normative realism--and argues that it fails instructively. Glick seeks the ground of the Born rule's objectivity among states of affairs and construes an agent's perspective as a location within an already-constituted world; finding no state of affairs fit to bind every agent at once, he must book the ground as brute. Phenomenology supplies the third thing his picture lacks. A horizon is not a position within the world but the condition under which a world is given. Read as an agent's weighting--her curvature--of such a horizon, the quantum state is neither a defective description nor a brute posit, and the Born rule articulates the invariant lawfulness by which any sense confers a curvature at all.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Harald A Wiltsche. 2026-08-26. The Limit and Its Ground. QBism, Scientific Realism, and the Born Rule. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22159
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.