arXiv · 2609.24332
Autoencoders vs. Numerical Analysis--Informed Manifold Learning for Navier--Stokes Flows
Abstract
Autoencoders (AEs) have become a dominant approach to nonlinear latent-space construction in data-driven reduced-order modelling (ROM), with their decoders lifting latent representations back to the ambient state space. Their prominence, however, has overshadowed an established alternative: manifold-learning methods grounded in classical numerical analysis. We revisit this alternative using Parsimonious Diffusion Maps (PDMs), benchmarking them against Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD)-based ROMs and several convolutional AE architectures for the two-dimensional incompressible flow past a rotating cylinder ---a bifurcating Navier-Stokes (NS) system organized by a codimension-2 Bogdanov-Takens point and its associated Hopf, saddle-node, and homoclinic bifurcations. Our approach uses PDMs to identify a parsimonious and interpretable set of intrinsic latent coordinates and to estimate their dimension directly from data. Gaussian process regression then learns the latent dynamics, while convex K-nearest-neighbor (K-NN) interpolation in PDMs space constructs the pre-image map, for which we establish pointwise consistency. The resulting nonlinear ROM substantially outperforms POD-based ROMs and achieves reconstruction and prediction accuracy comparable to ---and, in some bifurcating regimes, better than--- that of AE-based ROMs. At the same time, latent-variable learning with PDMs requires orders of magnitude less computational time than AE training.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Alessandro Della Pia, Lucia Russo, Ioannis Kevrekidis, Constantinos Siettos. 2026-09-21. Autoencoders vs. Numerical Analysis--Informed Manifold Learning for Navier--Stokes Flows. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24332
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.