Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.25071

Who Enters the Record? Paywalls, Contributor Selection, and Social Learning

Abstract

This paper studies social learning when buying access to previous decisions also determines whose decision enters the record. Individuals first receive private information and then decide whether to pay for access. A positive price selects relatively weak private beliefs. With one founding observation, every buyer copies it, and the record acquires no further information. With a richer initial history, buyers can disagree and the record can improve; nevertheless, a price bounded away from zero prevents complete learning, even with unbounded private beliefs. We then consider a rule under which a buyer makes a preliminary choice before access and a revised choice afterward. A positive probability of implementing the preliminary choice makes it follow the private signal. Retaining both choices restores complete learning under a fixed effective fee or pooled myopic pricing, including with bounded beliefs. The rule reduces willingness to pay and sacrifices some current decision accuracy. A worked example shows how the subsequent improvement in information can outweigh both initial losses. The results show why preserving a judgment made before exposure can change what later users learn from the same selected population.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maria Kovalenko, Georgy Lukyanov. 2026-09-18. Who Enters the Record? Paywalls, Contributor Selection, and Social Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25071

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Contracting under Misspecification

This paper studies agency problems when both parties worry that the model linking action to output is misspecified. With observable actions, an optimal contract is linear in output, so performance pay arises solely to share misspecification exposure, the slope reflects the parties' relative robustness concerns, and its allocation is Pareto efficient. With hidden actions, this sharing rule survives and incentives add a nonlinear correction. Misspecification concerns can polarize effort by making intermediate actions impossible to implement. Moreover, ambiguity across competing models has asymmetric effects: uncertainty about desired actions raises the principal's payoff, whereas uncertainty about deviations can lower it.

econ.TH↗

Allocative Efficiency and the Returns to Innovation

Innovation changes welfare through the technology it adds and the reallocation it causes between producers with different markups. When producers set markups, an innovator's own output and price adjustments have no private value at the margin, so reallocation reaches its profit only through others' responses. For an innovator small in its markets, none of the change in allocative efficiency, which is of the same order as its cost saving, reaches its profit under quantity or price competition. A process innovator is paid its cost saving, forgoing its own and downstream markups on added output. For U.S. public firms in 2015, these average 14 to 26 percent of that saving, and allocative efficiency rises or falls by more than a tenth of the private return for innovators holding 56 percent of sales. With estimated spillovers, patenting firms' R&D has a social return 6.24 times its private return.

econ.TH↗

A unified decision model for Bayesian ambiguity and non-affine statistics

This paper studies decision functionals under ambiguity when pure-risk evaluation is determined by a general, possibly non-affine statistic. We represent ambiguity perception by a Bayesian second-order model over first-order models and encode ambiguity attitude with a separate parameter. We formulate four consistency and monotonicity properties for decision functionals combining these objects. We show that second-order averaging does not generally preserve these properties for non-affine statistics, including expected shortfall, the industry-standard risk measure. To address this limitation, we introduce an ambiguity iron, a mapping from a second-order model and an ambiguity attitude to an ambiguity set of first-order models. Worst-case evaluation over this set preserves the chosen statistic as the pure-risk criterion. We construct an ambiguity iron by distorting the second-order model and show that it produces convex and compact sets of predictive models. We derive formulas for several classes of statistics and, in parametric settings, a sample-based approximation for the distorted expectation. Portfolio examples illustrate how ambiguity perception and attitude affect evaluations and allocations. Under posterior concentration and continuity of the parametrization, the ambiguity sets contract, and the associated decision functionals converge to their pure-risk values. We also describe a KL-based robustification for possible model misspecification.

econ.TH↗