Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.26312

Quantitative coverability for probabilistic well-structured transition systems

Abstract

Well-structured transition systems (WSTS) provide a classical framework for the verification of infinite-state systems, but their probabilistic extensions lack a unified treatment of quantitative coverability: path-enumeration algorithms assume a finite branching degree, while alternative approximation schemes defer some computations, such as probabilities over a bounded horizon, to the model at hand. We introduce probabilistic well-structured transition systems (pWSTS), Markov chains over countable state sets whose underlying transition systems are WSTS, with no a priori assumption on the branching degree. This class encompasses any WSTS equipped with a Markov kernel, such as probabilistic vector addition systems (pVAS) and probabilistic lossy channel systems (pLCS). For an effective subclass, we solve the approximate quantitative coverability problem over bounded horizons, and over infinite horizons under decisiveness, requiring no probabilistic information beyond individual transition probabilities. We then identify a general source of decisiveness: every stochastically monotone pWSTS is decisive with respect to every upward-closed set. We finally instantiate the framework on multi-type Galton--Watson processes, a classical model of population dynamics whose offspring distributions may have infinite support. Under mild assumptions on the reproduction laws, these processes are effective pWSTS, and they are stochastically monotone, hence decisive. Approximate quantitative coverability is therefore computable for them over both horizons, with a proof that uses none of the traditional tools: neither generating functions nor any case distinction between regimes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Raphaël Faure, Alain Finkel, Gaspard Fougea, Lina Ye. 2026-09-22. Quantitative coverability for probabilistic well-structured transition systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26312

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO