Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.27727

Sovereign Grassroots Currencies: A CBDC Architecture for Credit and Monetary Policy (Full Version)

Ehud Shapiro
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is central-bank money in digital form, held by the public. Leading designs have two limitations: conversion from bank deposits into CBDC can accelerate deposit flight, requiring safeguards; the CBDC stays outside credit creation and monetary-policy operations. Here we present a CBDC architecture that overcomes these limitations, based on grassroots currencies. It has three components: (1) Money: sovereign grassroots coins, which are digital debts of one unit of fiat currency issued by the central bank, constituting a direct CBDC; (2) Credit and Liquidity: non-sovereign grassroots coins, which are digital debts of one unit of the same fiat currency, redeemable at par, that can be issued by any person, natural or legal - adding credit; and (3) Interest: grassroots bonds, sovereign and non-sovereign - adding maturity, and with it interest, standard banking instruments, and the central bank's instruments of monetary policy. The central bank can therefore lend, absorb liquidity, set its rates and buy and sell securities in the coins and bonds the public holds, choosing the counterparties and terms of its credit operations, and without converting bank deposits into newly issued central bank money on demand. We prove that one unit of the fiat currency is the only arbitrage-free price of a grassroots coin whose issuer meets presentations, and argue that the central bank's lending rate and the rate on its own bonds bound what its counterparties pay and accept on comparable terms; the central bank can choose to deal with any counterparty, not just banks.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNcs.DCcs.MAq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ehud Shapiro. 2026-09-23. Sovereign Grassroots Currencies: A CBDC Architecture for Credit and Monetary Policy (Full Version). https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27727

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Decomposing Wage Stagnation: Employment Reallocation, Wage Structure,and Demographics

Japan's average log real hourly wages rose until the mid-1990s, declined through the mid-2010s, and partially recovered thereafter. This paper decomposes these changes over 1980-2024 into four components: demographic change across worker types, changes in relative employment shares across job types, changes in relative log wages across job types, and unweighted mean wage growth. The framework combines a shift-share decomposition across worker types with an extension of the Olley-Pakes decomposition across job types within worker types, separating employment reallocation from changes in relative wage structure. The four components vary across periods. Before 1996, unweighted mean wage growth and changes in relative wage structure contribute positively, while demographic change and employment reallocation contribute negatively. During 1996-2014, all four components are negative. After 2014, the recovery mainly reflects unweighted mean wage growth. Employment reallocation and changes in relative wage structure contribute differently across dimensions of job type.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Complements or Substitutes? Technology Adoption and Clinical Care Utilization: Evidence from Automated Insulin Delivery

Whether medical technology reduces or increases demand for professional care is central to understanding its effects on healthcare utilization and costs. We study automated insulin delivery (AID) adoption among 1,608 adults with type 1 diabetes treated in four specialist clinics of the Italian National Health Service, 283 of whom adopt AID. Because adoption is clinically targeted and staggered, we combine risk-set coarsened exact matching with a staggered event-study design. Matching retains 181 adopters with comparable untreated controls. We further adjust for differential pre-adoption trends by extrapolating the untreated trajectory in event time. After adjustment, AID adoption is associated with greater routine outpatient engagement. The estimated effect on the probability of a diabetologist visit is 16.3 percentage points one semester after adoption and 39.3 percentage points four semesters after adoption, relative to a 55.2% visit probability in the semester before adoption. HbA1c testing and a broader process-of-care index show similar positive patterns, although the evidence is less precise. The visit estimates remain sensitive to the trend-extrapolation assumption and should therefore be interpreted conditionally on that restriction. The findings are consistent with a task-based view in which automation substitutes for routine dosing decisions while complementing clinical labor through interpretive, adjustment, and supervisory tasks. Patient-facing automation may therefore reorganize rather than simply reduce healthcare use.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Mining Meaning: Measurement Error in AI-Assisted Literature Reviews

Researchers increasingly use generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), to automate tasks across the research pipeline. We study the reliability of these tools at the reading, classification, and synthesis of large bodies of academic literature. We frame LLM-assisted literature reviews as a measurement problem, treating models as measurement systems and tracing how their errors affect downstream conclusions. As a test case, we use three different implementations of ChatGPT to identify and extract metadata from economics papers that use rainfall as an instrumental variable. We benchmark each implementation against a subset of human-labeled evaluation data, and then deploy those implementations to extract metadata from the full corpus. The LLMs perform well on binary classification, but performance deteriorates as tasks demand greater contextual interpretation. More importantly, how much researchers can rely on model outputs depends not only on the complexity of the reading task but also on the type of claims the data is asked to support. The same amount of measurement error substantially affects paper-level claims while having little effect on broader claims about the literature. Measurement error in LLM-generated data is thus most consequential at precisely the level of detail that constitutes an LLM's principal value added over human reviewers. We conclude that standard model performance metrics are informative about the quality of generated data but do not by themselves establish the credibility of downstream inference. Researchers must also evaluate whether substantive claims are robust to the measurement system used to generate the underlying data.

econ.GN↗