Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.27867

Evaluation Choices Decide the Forecasting Leaderboard: Evidence from a Production Marketplace Panel

Md Rezwanul Islam·Wael Mohammed
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A forecasting benchmark reports which method won. We show that the answer is set by the evaluator's choices before any model is fitted. We benchmark 24 forecasting methods and one textbook reference, including six 2025-era time series foundation models, on a production marketplace panel of 1,887 business customers over 67 months. We hold the data, the horizon and the period fixed, and vary only the evaluation design. Three choices each reverse or dissolve a headline conclusion. Changing the unit of analysis from the market total to the individual customer moves our production baseline from second of nineteen, beaten by nothing, to twenty-third of twenty-five. Nineteen of its twenty-four challengers beat it there. Changing how much error is pooled decides whether a Diebold-Mariano test finds anything at all. Scoring prediction intervals rather than point forecasts reorders the field almost completely, with a rank correlation of 0.02 on intermittent demand. We then measure what the deployed system gets from this. Its selection rule captures 55% of the distance between doing nothing and choosing with hindsight. The reversal is not a quirk of our data. We ran the released protocol, unchanged, on the public M5 retail panel. The same baseline shape places first at the market total and last per series, beaten by everything, and a replayed selection rule closes 64.7% of the same floor-to-ceiling distance there. Adding five zero-shot foundation models to that roster changes who wins at the total, not the shape. The bands' blind spot travels too: conformal bands under-cover most on the spikiest items. Splitting our own panel into ever smaller groups turns the contrast into a curve: the baseline's rank worsens at every level of disaggregation. We release the evaluation protocol and report an error of our own that inverted a result before we caught it.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGstat.APstat.ME

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Md Rezwanul Islam, Wael Mohammed. 2026-08-20. Evaluation Choices Decide the Forecasting Leaderboard: Evidence from a Production Marketplace Panel. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27867

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Random Polytope Descriptors

We introduce a class of random polytopes which simultaneously generalizes several known constructions. While being fairly general, these polytopes are also computationally exceptionally benign. We indicate how these properties can be exploited for classification and clustering tasks in data analysis. Crucially, our construction lets users smoothly trade off between a tighter description of the data and faster computation.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

CurvFed: Curvature-Aligned Federated Learning for Fairness without Demographics

Modern human sensing applications often rely on data distributed across users and devices, where privacy concerns prevent centralized training. Federated Learning (FL) addresses this challenge by enabling collaborative model training without exposing raw data or attributes. However, achieving fairness in such settings remains difficult, as most human sensing datasets lack demographic labels, and FL's privacy guarantees limit the use of sensitive attributes. This paper introduces CurvFed: Curvature Aligned Federated Learning for Fairness without Demographics, a theoretically grounded framework that promotes fairness in FL without requiring any demographic or sensitive attribute information, a concept termed Fairness without Demographics (FWD), by optimizing the underlying loss landscape curvature. Building on the theory that equivalent loss landscape curvature corresponds to consistent model efficacy across sensitive attribute groups, CurvFed regularizes the top eigenvalue of the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) as an efficient proxy for loss landscape curvature, both within and across clients. This alignment promotes uniform model behavior across diverse bias inducing factors, offering an attribute agnostic route to algorithmic fairness. CurvFed is especially suitable for real world human sensing FL scenarios involving single or multi user edge devices with unknown or multiple bias factors. We validated CurvFed through theoretical and empirical justifications, as well as comprehensive evaluations using three real world datasets and a deployment on a heterogeneous testbed of resource constrained devices. Additionally, we conduct sensitivity analyses on local training data volume, client sampling, communication overhead, resource costs, and runtime performance to demonstrate its feasibility for practical FL edge device deployment.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Path Regularization: A Near-Complete and Optimal Nonasymptotic Generalization Theory for Multilayer Neural Networks and Double Descent Phenomenon

Path regularization has shown to be a very effective regularization to train neural networks, leading to a better generalization property than common regularizations i.e. weight decay, etc. We propose a first near-complete (as will be made explicit in the main text) nonasymptotic generalization theory for multilayer neural networks with path regularizations for general learning problems. In particular, it does not require the boundedness of the loss function, as is commonly assumed in the literature. Our theory goes beyond the bias-variance tradeoff and aligns with phenomena typically encountered in deep learning. It is therefore sharply different from other existing nonasymptotic generalization error bounds. More explicitly, we propose an explicit generalization error upper bound for multilayer neural networks with $σ(0)=0$ and sufficiently broad Lipschitz loss functions, without requiring the width, depth, or other hyperparameters of the neural network to approach infinity, a specific neural network architecture (e.g., sparsity), or boundedness of the loss function, while also taking approximation error into consideration. In particular, we solve an open problem proposed by Weinan E et. al. in 2020 regarding the approximation rates in generalized Barron spaces. Furthermore, we show the near-minimax optimality of our theory for regression problems with ReLU activations. Notably, our upper bound exhibits the famous double descent phenomenon for such networks, which is the most distinguished characteristic compared with other existing results. Our subsequent work will prove the matching lower bounds in the minimax sense, meaning that it is highly possible that our theory reveals the true underlying mechanism of the double descent phenomenon. We can also explain scaling law from this theory.

cs.LG↗