Complexity Barriers to State Preparation in Quantum Approximate Optimization

Abstract

For many important optimization problems we are restricted to approximate solutions in practice due to computational complexity. Distinct from the exact optimization setting, approximate optimization admits performance measures beyond whether the optimum is found, with different tradeoffs and complexity. For MaxCut, a near-unity (ordinary) approximation ratio can coexist with near-zero improvement (gain) over a random cut. For the standard encoding, the unconditional classical MaxCut-Gain hardness gap implies that \emph{any uniformly efficient quantum or hybrid procedure recovering a fixed positive fraction of the optimal classical gain on every input, with at least inverse-polynomial success probability, would place} NP \emph{in} BQP. Such a procedure is therefore believed impossible under standard assumptions. We broadly address where our worst-case barriers do or do not apply across the quantum algorithm landscape. We prove that the barrier survives quantum random access optimization (QRAO) compression and applies between the classical and relaxed optimal values. For every input, a product state attains the classical optimum. Thus the barrier to reaching the classical threshold does not arise from a need for entanglement. For $d\in\{2,3\}$ variables per qubit, the known decoder transfers encoded energy gain to decoded mean gain by the exact factor $1/d^2$. Combining this identity with MaxCut-Gain hardness gives an operational preparation barrier for QRAO. We also construct hard $n$-qubit families with relative quantum relaxation excess $Θ(1/n)$, while the maximally mixed state has energy approximation ratio $1-Θ(1/n)$, zero encoded energy gain, and hence zero decoded mean gain. Our results separate the effects of relaxation tightness and energy approximation from operational accessibility, motivating more comprehensive accounting in benchmarking and performance assessment.