Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.31536

Collective impact of opinion formation on agent-based epidemic dynamics

Abstract

Epidemic spread and collective opinion formation are tightly coupled processes: individual beliefs about the severity of an outbreak and the value of protective measures shape behavior, while the evolving epidemic itself reshapes public sentiment through risk perception. We propose an agent-based framework that couples opinion dynamics with a compartmental epidemic model, in which each agent carries both a health status and a continuous opinion variable describing adherence to protective measures. Opinion evolution is driven by binary interactions among agents and by an exogenous background field that reflects the current state of the epidemic, while the disease transmission rate depends explicitly on the opinions of interacting agents. Using methods of statistical mechanics, we characterize the resulting macroscopic system for the compartmental mass fractions and mean opinions in both far-from-equilibrium and close-to-equilibrium regimes. The calibration shows that incorporating behavioral opinion dynamics substantially improves the interpretation of epidemic evolution. In particular, the inferred risk perception function evolves consistently with the observed epidemic burden, indicating that behavioral adaptation can explain part of the temporal variation that would otherwise be absorbed into time-dependent transmission parameters. Our results illustrate how integrating opinion heterogeneity in kinetic epidemic models offers quantitative insights into the feedback between behavior and disease spread.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrea Bondesan, Riccardo Vecchio, Chiara Barbati, Jonathan Franceschi, Anna Odone, Mattia Zanella. 2026-09-25. Collective impact of opinion formation on agent-based epidemic dynamics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31536

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Emergence of cooperation in nonlinear higher-order public goods games

Evolutionary game theory has provided substantial contributions to explain the emergence of cooperation under unfavorable conditions in ecology, economics, and the social sciences. Recently, inspired by newly available empirical evidence on group interactions, higher-order networks have emerged as a natural framework to encode multiplayer games in structured populations. Here, we study the emergence of cooperation in nonlinear public goods games on hypergraphs, where collective reinforcement captures the synergistic or discounting effect associated with each additional cooperator. In well-mixed populations, when all games have the same number of players, the system displays a transition whose nature changes from continuous to discontinuous depending on the form of nonlinearity. By contrast, when games involving different numbers of players coexist, an additional bistability region between an active coexistence state and full cooperation may emerge. We further find that scale-free hypergraphs promote cooperation, highlighting the crucial role played by both the initial placement of cooperators and the presence of hyperdegree correlations. Overall, our results provide a comprehensive characterization of nonlinear public goods games on hypergraphs and open avenues for richer models of evolutionary dynamics of multiplayer games on structured populations.

physics.soc-ph↗

Clustering in co-evolving opinion dynamics: reduced SPDE models

Clustering is a fundamental collective phenomenon in agent-based models (ABMs) of opinion dynamics. To study clustering in systems with co-evolving social and opinion variables, we derive stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) models that describe the evolution of clusters. Specifically, these SPDE models are reduced in the sense that their domain accounts only for social variables, while opinion variables are instead incorporated in a multiplicative (Eulerian velocity-type) fashion. The model reduction is primarily guided by computational efficiency, as well as model interpretability. We consider two settings: one in which opinions do not affect social interactions, and another one in which a feedback mechanism couples the two. Our approach extends reduced PDE modelling to a stochastic framework, which is essential for capturing long-term cluster behaviour. Numerical experiments indeed demonstrate that the proposed reduced SPDEs substantially decrease computational cost compared to full-state SPDE models, such as the Dean--Kawasaki equation, while still accurately reproducing the clustering behaviour of the underlying ABM. As a result, these reduced models provide an efficient tool for studying systems with large populations, including those arising in the analysis of real-world data: in particular, we provide an application related to the large-scale General Social Survey (GSS), which comprises opinion and social data of the US population since 1972.

physics.soc-ph↗

Measuring the impact of hits

Many real systems can be represented as growing networks where new nodes and links gradually emerge. The Barabási-Albert model for growing networks, and many models inspired by it, are based on the idea that nodes compete for links. However, the strength and the very presence of this competition have not been tested. We propose a robust statistical approach to quantify how strongly nodes compete for links, and apply it to data from various real systems---commenting on online news and cinema attendance data. We find a range of possible behaviors, from the perfectly elastic case, where new entrants shape network growth in a way that leaves the rest of the system unaffected, to an intermediate case where new entrants measurably affect the rest. Perfect competition is never observed. These findings have direct implications for complex systems modeling and e-commerce applications.

physics.soc-ph↗