Data Processing for Offline Evaluation in Recommender Systems: a Survey

Alberto Carlo Maria Mancino; Angela Di Fazio; Danilo Danese; Matteo Attimonelli; Daniele Malitesta; Antonio Ferrara; Claudio Pomo; Tommaso Di Noia

arXiv · 2609.31696

Data Processing for Offline Evaluation in Recommender Systems: a Survey

Alberto Carlo Maria Mancino·Angela Di Fazio·Danilo Danese·Matteo Attimonelli·Daniele Malitesta·Antonio Ferrara·Claudio Pomo·Tommaso Di Noia

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Offline evaluation is the dominant experimental paradigm in recommender systems research, enabling reproducible and cost-effective comparisons on historical interaction data. Yet, while considerable attention has been devoted to recommendation models and evaluation methodologies, the data processing decisions that precede model training have received less scrutiny. These decisions determine the information available to recommendation algorithms and can affect the comparability and reproducibility of experimental results. This survey provides a systematic, cross-domain characterisation of data processing practices for the offline evaluation of recommender systems. We examine the data-centric pipeline, from dataset selection and interaction representation to data preparation, multimodal feature extraction, and train-validation-test splitting. Our analysis spans recommendation paradigms, including collaborative, sequential, session-based, graph-based, knowledge-aware, context-aware, multimodal, federated, cross-domain, contrastive-learning, and LLM-based recommendation. Beyond reviewing existing practices, we introduce a unified framework and taxonomy for describing data transformations and feature-extraction strategies, distinguishing data preparation from the extraction of representations from multimodal side information. Our empirical analysis reveals a landscape dominated by a narrow set of dataset-level transformations, particularly support-driven filtering, while representation-dependent transformations remain less common. We further identify substantial heterogeneity in how auxiliary information is prepared and represented, as well as inconsistencies in the specification of data splitting protocols, where similar labels may conceal different experimental conditions.

Explore related subjects

cs.IR cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Alberto Carlo Maria Mancino, Angela Di Fazio, Danilo Danese, Matteo Attimonelli, Daniele Malitesta, Antonio Ferrara, Claudio Pomo, Tommaso Di Noia. 2026-09-18. Data Processing for Offline Evaluation in Recommender Systems: a Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31696

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Subtraction Gets You More: Gap-Aware Retrieval for Multimodal Multi-Hop QA

In multimodal multi-hop question answering, we focus on the initial retrieval stage via two distinct tasks: (1) evidence set completion, retrieving missing evidence given context, and (2) sequential pool construction, iteratively building the top-$K$ pool from the scratch. Under these settings, we point out that conventional iterative retrieval frameworks often suffer from Semantic Anchoring, where previously fetched evidence traps the retriever and yields entity-centric redundancy. To break this trap, we propose GRAIL (Gap-aware Retrieval via Adaptive Implicit Localization), a paradigm that performs implicit query rewriting directly at the embedding level. By context-subtractive query steering, GRAIL excels at compositional cross-modal reasoning, while additive embedding updates show strength on localized information aggregation. To leverage these complementary strengths, we propose a Task-Adaptive Hybrid Framework, achieving a 35.7% macro-averaged performance gain on the MultimodalQA evidence set completion task. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that sequential GRAIL retrieves in a superior, noise-resilient manner, significantly expanding the search horizon through iterative gap-aware optimization.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Making Collaborative Signals Count: Graph-Aware Large Language Models for Sequential Recommendation

Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted as backbones for recommender systems. However, their language-centric pretraining makes it difficult to capture collaborative signals implicit in user-item interactions, which are crucial for personalized recommendation. Existing methods either inject collaborative representations produced by external recommenders or model only intra-sequence dependencies, limiting their ability to exploit global collaborative patterns. To address this limitation, we propose GALLM, a graph-aware LLM framework for sequential recommendation. GALLM constructs a collaborative graph over text tokens and item tokens, and models three types of relations: Text--Text relations for preserving semantic dependencies, Item--Text relations for aligning item tokens with their textual descriptions, and Item--Item relations derived from global item co-occurrence patterns. These relations are transformed into lightweight learnable attention biases and incorporated into the LLM attention mechanism, enabling collaborative-aware token interactions without introducing an additional graph encoder. Experiments on four real-world benchmarks show that GALLM achieves the best performance among the compared baselines, improving over the strongest baseline by 9.76\% on average in HR@5. The code is available at https://github.com/Fenglin-miku/GALLM.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

QD-Rec: Open-Ended Evolution of Recommendations via Quality-Diversity

Open-ended search combined with foundation models has produced advances such as faster algorithms, new results on open mathematical problems, and self-improving agents. We extend this paradigm to recommendation for decision-making, focusing on decisions where the set of possible choices is fixed but the reasons for choosing them are not. In high-stakes decisions, e.g., which company to acquire or which customer to target, comparing diverse, well-reasoned options can be more useful than a single ranked list. We formalize open-ended recommendation as building a diverse, high-quality set of recommendations, each an item together with a hypothesis, a natural-language reason why the item fits the needs of a decision maker. We propose QD-Rec, a quality--diversity method that selects items with a contextual bandit and generates hypotheses with a foundation model from earlier ones kept in an archive as stepping stones. A new recommendation enters the archive if it is novel or better than its nearest neighbor. Across M&A, customer targeting, and paper and book recommendation, QD-Rec gives the highest mean quality and builds the largest archive in most settings.

cs.IR↗