Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.31699

Normalise or condition? Noise-floor front-ends for on-board keyword spotting under UAV rotor ego-noise

Abstract

A microphone on the airframe of a small multi-rotor UAV is dominated by rotor ego-noise, so spoken flight commands arrive at negative signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We study small-footprint keyword spotting (KWS) for a ten-word command vocabulary under real ego-noise, training on one quadrotor and testing on another. Besides per-clip accuracy we measure the streaming false-alarm rate on 4.4 h of continuous rotor noise. We compare classical noise-robust front-ends (CMN, PCEN, spectral subtraction), test-time adaptation, and two front-ends that track the per-band ego-noise floor over the two seconds preceding the decision window and either subtract it (normalisation) or feed it to the network as a second input channel (conditioning). Per clip, all front-ends look alike: +2-3 points on average, up to +14 at -15 dB. On continuous rotor noise they differ sharply. Normalising front-ends fire about ten times more often than plain log-mel at the same threshold and end up below it at a budget of one false alarm per hour (-9 points at 0 dB). Conditioning keeps the baseline's false-alarm rate and turns its gain into detections (+8 points at -10 dB over three seeds); on top of PCEN it gives the best per-clip accuracy and false-alarm rate, and a level-anchored variant is also invariant to the microphone gain. Real drone+interferer recordings expose the remaining failure mode, environmental sounds and bystander speech, which training negatives halve. A single script reproduces all on-device numbers on the NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX flight computer, where the complete pipeline costs 3 ms per 100 ms hop on the CPU.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yida Lin, Bing Xue, Mengjie Zhang, Sam Schofield, Richard Green. 2026-09-19. Normalise or condition? Noise-floor front-ends for on-board keyword spotting under UAV rotor ego-noise. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31699

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Same Words, Different Judgments: How Preferences Vary Across Modalities

Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) is the dominant framework for aligning AI systems to human preferences. However, evaluation protocols for such data were designed for text and have not been validated for speech. We present the first intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)-based, controlled cross-modal study of human and synthetic preference annotations, comparing text and audio evaluations of identical semantic content across 100 prompts. We show that achieving \textit{good} agreement within either modality (ICC(2,$k$) $\approx$ .80) requires $\sim$9 raters and modalities show marked differences in how people report preferences: audio raters exhibit narrower decision thresholds, reduced length bias, and more user-oriented evaluation criteria, with near-chance cross-modality agreement. We demonstrate that synthetic ratings can be used to effectively predict inter-rater agreement, thus serving as an early signal for stimulus selection and proxy for human annotations. Together, these findings argue that evaluation protocols for audio preference data require modality-specific design rather than direct adaptation from text. Code, data, and the audio corpus are available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/sciminds/same-words-different-judgements

cs.SD↗

Oído: Real-Time Open-Vocabulary Speech Recognition on a $5 Microcontroller without a Neural Accelerator

Speech recognition on low-cost microcontrollers is, in practice, limited to keyword spotting or a fixed list of commands. We present Oído, an inference engine and a family of models that run open-vocabulary English speech recognition entirely on an ESP32-S3 (240 MHz Xtensa LX7, 8 MB of PSRAM, 16 MB of flash, no neural accelerator) faster than real time on one core. Version 1 of this work ran a 13 M-parameter Conformer-CTC at 1.97x the duration of the audio. We measured on the board that the bound was memory traffic and per-frame cost, not arithmetic: external memory reads at 89 MB/s (PSRAM) and 32 MB/s (flash), and a streaming recognizer re-reads every weight for every chunk. Version 2 combines a model built for that memory system (80 ms frame stacking, a 64-channel front end, 12 or 16 blocks, int4 weights that mostly fit in PSRAM, fine-tuned from the version 1 model) with engine changes that overlap the weight stream with compute (an asynchronous data-cache preload), keep work buffers in SRAM and make the decoder cheap. On a physical board the streaming real-time factor falls from 1.77 to 0.54 (variant B) and 0.72 (variant A), the final text appears 259 ms (B) or 431 ms (A) after the end of speech with audio fed at real-time speed, and the host build and the firmware produce identical transcripts. Variant A reaches 7.1%/16.4% word error rate on LibriSpeech test-clean/test-other in streaming mode with 0.64 s chunks and the on-chip language model (4.6%/10.7% with full context). Code, models and the raw board measurements are released.

cs.SD↗

Biologically Inspired Predictive Gating Signed-Dyadic Coding for Mandarin Keyword Spotting

In continuous spiking keyword spotting, temporally correlated acoustic frames can repeatedly trigger memory access and neural computation at a dense input interface, even when hidden activity is sparse. Predictive processing and sensory adaptation suggest retaining predictable input locally and responding selectively to deviations. Inspired by this mechanism, we propose Predictive Gating Signed-Dyadic Coding (PG). PG maintains a local prediction for each input channel and transmits an event only when the residual exceeds a learned threshold. Each event carries a sign and a finite power-of-two magnitude, and the receiver reconstructs it with fixed-point shifts and additions. In Mandarin keyword spotting, INPUT-PG reaches 90.00% accuracy while reducing mean SRAM reads by 33.87% and inference cycles by 32.77%. PG provides a hardware interface for research on low-power continuous speech processing and event-based sensory systems.

cs.SD↗