Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.32217

No-Restart Elasticity in an Adaptive Runtime System for Cloud-Native HPC

Abstract

Exploiting discounted spot instances for HPC requires an application to change its resource allocation at runtime, shrinking ahead of an interruption and expanding onto replacement capacity. Existing elasticity mechanisms implement rescaling as a full process teardown followed by a cold restart at the new processor count, and the restart stage accounts for up to 95% of the total overhead, growing with node count and increasing substantially on GPUs due to CUDA context initialization. In this paper, we present a no-restart rescaling mechanism for the Charm++ runtime system in which surviving processes never exit: a rescaling operation consists of a membership negotiation with a lightweight external coordinator, reconciliation of the UCX communication endpoints with the new cluster view, and a return to the top of the runtime initialization path that preserves live application state. This reduces the cost of a rescaling operation, excluding the load balancing step that any rescaling model requires, from multiple seconds to 8--15ms on CPUs and 7--11ms on GPUs, at 4 to 32 instances. Because processes survive, GPU device state persists in place, eliminating the checkpointing daemons previously required for GPU elasticity, and a launcher-independent bootstrap mechanism removes the dependence on supervised process managers, which are incompatible with spot instance interruptions. Integrated with an existing spot instance management framework, the mechanism cuts the end-to-end overhead of eight simultaneous interruptions to 0.2% of runtime on CPUs and 0.6% on GPUs, and raises the rate at which a job can be rescaled below 1% overhead by a factor of seven.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aditya Bhosale, Laxmikant Kale. 2026-09-26. No-Restart Elasticity in an Adaptive Runtime System for Cloud-Native HPC. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32217

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Recolorable Graph Exploration by an Oblivious Agent with Fewer Colors

Recently, Böckenhauer, Frei, Unger, and Wehner (SIROCCO 2023) introduced a novel variant of the graph exploration problem in which a single memoryless agent must visit all nodes of an unknown, undirected, and connected graph before returning to its starting node. Unlike the standard model for mobile agents, edges are not labeled with port numbers. Instead, the agent can color its current node and observe the color of each neighboring node. To move, it specifies a target color and then moves to an adversarially chosen neighbor of that color. Böckenhauer~et al.~analyzed the minimum number of colors required for successful exploration and proposed an elegant algorithm that enables the agent to explore an arbitrary graph using only eight colors. In this paper, we present a novel graph exploration algorithm that requires only six colors. Furthermore, we prove that five colors are sufficient if we consider only a restricted class of graphs, which we call the $φ$-free graphs, a class that includes every graph with maximum degree at most three and every cactus.

cs.DC↗

Scepsy: Serving Agentic Workflows Using Aggregate LLM Pipelines

Agentic workflows carry out complex tasks by orchestrating multiple large language models (LLMs) and tools. Serving them at a target throughput with low latency is hard because they are written in arbitrary agentic frameworks and their execution times are unpredictable: execution branches, fans out, or recurs in data-dependent ways. Since their LLMs often outnumber the available GPUs, they also oversubscribe GPUs. We describe Scepsy, a serving system that schedules arbitrary multi-LLM agentic workflows onto a GPU cluster. Scepsy exploits the insight that, while the end-to-end latency of an agentic workflow is unpredictable, each LLM's fraction of execution time is comparatively stable across requests. Scepsy profiles each LLM under different parallelism degrees and combines the profiles with these fractions into an Aggregate LLM Pipeline, a lightweight throughput and latency predictor for allocations. To minimize latency at a target throughput, Scepsy uses the Aggregate LLM Pipeline to search over fractional GPU shares, tensor parallelism degrees, and replica counts. A hierarchical heuristic then places the chosen allocation onto the cluster, minimizing fragmentation and respecting network topology. On realistic agentic workflows, Scepsy achieves up to 2.5x higher throughput before saturation and 1.0-3.3x lower latency than systems that optimize LLMs independently or rely on user-specified allocations.

cs.DC↗

The World's Fastest Matching Engine Algorithm

We drove 247 matching engines through one C ABI harness on one identical workload: every open-source FIFO implementation we could find, deduplicated, and our own, on the same gate. The workload doubles as a byte-identical correctness oracle, 1,000,000,000+ order messages per engine, replayed against an independent-engine consensus. Only 47 are correct as shipped; we filed 181 GitHub issues upstream, 28 already fixed by their maintainers, none declined. Our engine leads the 160 that reproduce the consensus by ~95 M/s (12.6x the second best) on worst-case throughput. One core sustains 103.4 million order messages per second (122.09 million on AMD EPYC processors) worst-case, and in the engine's production configuration its wire pipeline keeps single-book P99 host-path latency, OUCH parsing and OUCH/ITCH encoding included, under a microsecond through 82 M msgs/s; a 96-core server (~$1,630/month, 3-year reserved) reaches ~1.3 billion/s across over 10,000 symbols, for scale, over 45x the CTA consolidated quote feed's provisioned capacity. The lead is structural: the 73 engines written inside the trading industry sit under the same 8.19 M/s ceiling as the rest of the field, and it is one of them that sets it.

cs.DC↗