Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.32620

Space versus Context: Competition for limited neural resources determines engram cell allocation in the hippocampus

Abstract

Engram cells in hippocampal CA1 represent contextual information associated with events experienced by animals and constitute a cellular substrate of episodic memory. Recent experiments have shown that a subset of hippocampal place cells is recruited as engram cells for individual contexts. However, the principle governing engram cell allocation across contexts remains unclear. Here, we develop an information-theoretic framework that quantifies the trade-off between spatial and contextual information encoded by CA1 neurons. Our theory shows that limited neural resources inevitably create competition among contexts for the recruitment of place cells as engram cells. Solving this optimization problem determines the fraction of engram cells allocated to each context as a function of its occurrence probability. The theory predicts a non-monotonic relationship between context probability and engram allocation, reflecting competition between spatial and contextual information under resource constraints. Consequently, the recruited fraction emerges through a discontinuous transition at a critical probability, reaches a maximum at intermediate probabilities, and decreases for highly frequent contexts. Furthermore, we analytically derive the phase boundary for the emergence of finite engram cell allocation as a function of contextual input strength and the relative importance of contextual information. These findings identify competition for limited neural resources as a key determinant of engram cell allocation and provide experimentally testable predictions for how memory representations are distributed across contexts under resource constraints.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kensuke Chiba, Jun-nosuke Teramae. 2026-09-26. Space versus Context: Competition for limited neural resources determines engram cell allocation in the hippocampus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.32620

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

BrainWave: A Brain Signal Foundation Model for Clinical Applications

Neural electrical activity is fundamental to brain function, underlying a range of cognitive and behavioral processes, including movement, perception, decision-making, and consciousness. Abnormal patterns of neural signaling often indicate the presence of underlying brain diseases. The variability among individuals, the diverse array of clinical symptoms from various brain disorders, and the limited availability of diagnostic classifications, have posed significant barriers to formulating reliable model of neural signals for diverse application contexts. Here, we present BrainWave, the first foundation model for both invasive and non-invasive neural recordings, pretrained on more than 40,000 hours of electrical brain recordings (13.79 TB of data) from approximately 16,000 individuals. Our analysis show that BrainWave outperforms all other competing models and consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance in the diagnosis and identification of neurological disorders. We also demonstrate robust capabilities of BrainWave in enabling zero-shot transfer learning across varying recording conditions and brain diseases, as well as few-shot classification without fine-tuning, suggesting that BrainWave learns highly generalizable representations of neural signals. We hence believe that open-sourcing BrainWave will facilitate a wide range of clinical applications in medicine, paving the way for AI-driven approaches to investigate brain disorders and advance neuroscience research.

q-bio.NC↗

Single-turn emergency psychiatric triage across 15 frontier AI chatbots

People increasingly turn to general-purpose AI chatbots for advice about emotional and mental health problems, but the ability of these systems to recognize and appropriately triage psychiatric emergencies remains under-characterized. We evaluated psychiatric triage performance in 15 frontier AI chatbots using 112 clinical vignettes spanning four urgency levels, from routine care to immediate emergency assessment. In each trial (1680 total), a chatbot received a single user message conveying all triage-relevant information from one vignette and recommended a timeframe for care. The primary outcome was emergency under-triage; secondary outcomes included triage accuracy and the direction of errors. Vignettes and user messages were generated using a clinician-verified LLM pipeline. Across 415 emergency trials, 23 were under-triaged (5.5%; 95% CI 1.8-15.9). Overall accuracy, averaged across urgency levels, ranged from 42.0% to 71.8% across chatbots and was lowest for intermediate cases (19.6%; 95% CI 11.7-28.1). Every chatbot showed a net over-triage bias; overall, 763 of 786 incorrect assignments (97.1%) were more urgent than the prespecified triage level. The error pattern was similar when predictions were assessed against clinician ratings: 35 of 430 trials involving vignettes rated as emergencies by at least 75% of clinicians were under-triaged (8.1%). AI chatbots recognized most psychiatric emergencies but still missed clinically important cases and frequently over-triaged less urgent presentations. Further evaluations should examine how triage performance changes when clinically relevant information must be elicited through conversation.

q-bio.NC↗

How Optimality Structures Sparse Dictionaries: Theory for Interpreting SAE Representations

Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have found success parsing neural network representations into interpretable concepts, providing a basis for understanding and control. However, what exactly SAEs extract and, hence, the scientific conclusions we can draw from them are not obvious. In short, if your SAE behaves strangely, does that reflect interesting neural network behaviour or an SAE-imposed distortion? Towards answering this, we use dictionary learning identifiability results to derive constraints that optimal dictionary learning features must satisfy. For example, an optimal feature will never turn on only while another is active. We use these conditions to explain various SAE oddities - hierarchical splitting & absorption, which features can be left in the residuals, dense antipodal features, and infinite feature splitting - simply as properties imposed by the dictionary learning objective. Finally, these constraints are diagnostic: real SAEs pass when measured on the dataset on which they were trained, but increasingly fail as the test dataset becomes more `distant'. In sum, we hope to provide theoretical tools to explain puzzling SAE patterns, allowing more principled inferences about internal model behaviour.

q-bio.NC↗