Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.34952

Consequences of Polylogarithmic Membership Comparability for SAT

Abstract

We study the consequences of membership comparators that exclude one possible membership vector, deterministically or with a relative advantage over uniform guessing. For every polynomially bounded arity, a randomized polynomial-time comparator of error at most $(1-1/poly(n))2^{-t}$ gives $ NP/ poly\cap coNP/ poly$ recognition with common advice. The proof uses limited independence, polynomial occurrence certificates, and a self-contained positive-relation advice transfer. For SAT at arity $O((\log n)^d)$, both this relative-gap hypothesis and deterministic comparability imply $PH=S^{NP}$, the uniform bound $PH\subseteq BPTIME(2^{O((\log n)^{d^2})})$, and symmetric verification with polynomial-length certificates and an oracle-free deterministic $2^{O((\log n)^d)}$ predicate. Polynomial-advice deterministic decoding has the same exponent $d$. Applying the randomized simulation to an unconditional diagonal language yields, for every fixed $\varepsilon>0$, $\mathrm{BPP}\subsetneq BPTIME(2^{O((\log n)^{d^2+\varepsilon})})$, without advice. The larger clock remains subexponential under every fixed number of self-compositions. A layered oracle satisfies deterministic comparability and $NP^O=coNP^O$ but excludes randomized NP algorithms with smaller logarithmic power, establishing a relativized limit on the SAT exponent $d$. This expanded version also develops the full weak-advantage regime, where saving $2^{-O((log n)^d)}$ gives randomized SAT exponent $d$ and PH exponent $d^k$ at fixed level $k$; the quasipolynomial and exponential hierarchy consequences; binary-comparator advice bounds; and the certificate-length boundary between the randomized regimes. Under deterministic comparability, uniform deterministic promise-unique search additionally gives $UEXP=EXP$. The ordinary second-level collapse $PH=Σ_2^p$ for $d>1$ remains unproved.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sebastian Ben Daniel. 2026-09-28. Consequences of Polylogarithmic Membership Comparability for SAT. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34952

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

SC Derandomization for Regular ROBPs and Models Beyond BPL

We study SC derandomizations for regular read-once branching programs (ROBPs) and computation models beyond BPL. For regular ROBPs with length $n$, width $w$, and multiple accept nodes, we attain three results. 1. When $n \le w$, we show an SC derandomization with space $O(\log^2 n+\log w)$ and error $1/\text{poly}(nw)$. 2. When $n \ge w$, we show an SC derandomization with space $O(\log n \log w)$ and error $1/\text{poly}(w)$. In addition, when $w=O(\log n)$, we attain an optimal $O(\log n)$ space derandomization with error $1/\poly(w)$. 3. When $w \le 2^{O(\sqrt{\log n})}$, we show that reachability of regular ROBPs (i.e. derandmization of one-sided but unbounded small error ROBPs) can be computed in SC. We further show that two super sets of BPL can be computed in SC. 1. For probabilistic logspace TMs with a two-way access random tape, we show that it can be approximated in SC if each entry of the random tape is accessed for at most a constant number of times. 2. For probabilistic logspace TMs with a polynomial size stack, i.e. probabilistic logspace Auxiliary Push-down Machines (AuxPDMs), we show that it can be approximated in SC if the timings of push/pop/idle stack operations do not depend on the randomness. The first model is the read-multiplicity model considered by Impagliazzo, Nisan, Wigderson (STOC'94), in which they show that their INW generator can fool such computations. For the second model, we indicate that it contains candidate languages separating BQL from BPL considered by Apers and Edenhofer (CCC'25).

cs.CC↗

Riftbound is Turing Complete

Riftbound: League of Legends Trading Card Game is a trading card game about capturing and holding locations in a king-of-the-hill style contest. Originally released in China in August of 2025, and later released in the United States in October of 2025, the game has been well received for its depth and complexity. In this paper we demonstrate a facet of this complexity by providing sequences of valid game states which construct Universal Turing machines within the game. Each of these machines are constructed with tournament legal decks at the time of writing and strategies assigned are directed by the game state. We also show that given an appropriate board state the machine may be constructed and the computation may be performed in one game turn.

cs.CC↗

Top-Down Lower Bounds for All Depths

We prove that Parity requires $2^{n^{Ω(1)}}$ size De Morgan circuits of constant depth using a new method which is completely "top-down" in the sense of [HJP95]. The proof relies crucially on the core ideas developed in a line of work [HJP95, PPZ99, MW19, GRSS24] which previously established top-down lower bounds for circuits of depth 3 and 4. We first present a proof of a lower bound $\exp(n^{3^{-d}})$. In this case, nearly all of the relevant combinatorial ideas necessary for the proof are already present in some form in [GRSS24]. We then present two extensions of this argument, the first achieving a lower bound $\exp(ε_d n^{1/(2d-2)})$ for some $ε_d>0$ depending only on $d$, and the second achieving the essentially tight lower bound $\exp(ε_d n^{1/(d-1)})$. These improved results each hinge on establishing a key lemma which quantifies the extent to which a high entropy random variable in $\{0,1\}^n$ will look close to uniform after projecting it onto a random small set of coordinates $R \subseteq [n]$.

cs.CC↗