Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.34959

A Joint Sampling Design for the Related Populations of Parents and Children

Abstract

We propose a novel joint sampling design for surveys involving two interrelated populations of parents and children in the presence of complex family structures, including shared parental responsibility and blended families. The design combines a graph-theoretic representation of co-parenting relationships with balanced sampling. This framework ensures that, in the first sampling phase, exactly one parent is selected from each co-responsibility pair while maintaining accurate inference for both the parent and child populations. A second sampling phase selects one child per sampled parent using unequal probabilities that produce consistent weighting and unbiased estimation. The proposed framework accommodates overlapping family relationships while balancing auxiliary information for both populations. Results based on the Luxembourg population registers show that the estimated totals are virtually identical to the known population totals for all balancing variables, and other auxiliary variables, demonstrating the excellent precision and efficiency of the proposed sampling design.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yves Tillé, María Guadarrama Sanz. 2026-09-28. A Joint Sampling Design for the Related Populations of Parents and Children. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34959

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Univariate-Guided Interaction Modeling

We propose a procedure for sparse regression with pairwise interactions, by generalizing the Univariate Guided Sparse Regression (UniLasso) methodology. A central contribution is our introduction of TripletScan, which screens a pair $(j,k)$ using the coefficient of $X_jX_k$ in the local regression of the response on $1$, $X_j$, $X_k$, and $X_jX_k$. The retained products are incorporated either jointly with the main effects through UniLasso, yielding uniPairs, or after a first-stage main-effects fit, yielding uniPairs-2stage. For the UniLasso components of the procedures, we prove false-positive exclusion and uniform coefficient-error bounds. In simulations and an HIV drug-resistance application, the proposed procedures produce substantially smaller fitted models than competing interaction methods while retaining competitive predictive performance.

stat.ME↗

Factoring A-Optimality into D-Optimality and Sphericity

The D criterion measures the volume of the joint confidence ellipsoid for the linear model coefficients and ignores its shape, so designs with the same D value can estimate individual effects with different variances. Meanwhile, A-optimality minimizes average coefficient variance. With both criteria expressed as information values, A equals D multiplied by a sphericity index for the same ellipsoid. In a fixed coefficient basis, sphericity further factors into coefficient-variance balance and a determinant-based correlation component. In five published screening comparisons, the A-optimal design has a larger correlation component despite slightly poorer variance balance; in three it also has a smaller D value. In a seven-run family of designs that all tie under D, the two with equal coefficient variances have the lowest A value. Both sphericity components can be calculated directly from standard errors and estimate correlations available in statistical software. After whitening by a prediction moment matrix, the same determinant-sphericity factorization applies to the I-criterion.

stat.ME↗

Testing the equality of parameters in fixed and increasing dimension

This paper proposes a general and unified framework for testing the equality of a broad class of parameters, defined as a smooth function of expectations of symmetric kernels, across multiple independent populations. We consider two test statistics, a Wald-type statistic and an ANOVA-type statistic. The asymptotic distribution of the first one is derived under a fixed-dimension regime, whereas the second one is studied under both fixed and increasing-dimension regimes, where the parameter dimension diverges with the sample size. Based on these limiting distributions, we construct test procedures enabling asymptotically exact inference without parametric assumptions. Additionally, an alternative null distribution estimator based on a weighted bootstrap approximation is studied, which is applicable to the ANOVA-type statistic under a fixed-dimension regime. The finite-sample performance and computational efficiency of the proposed procedures are evaluated through an extensive simulation study and a real dataset application.

stat.ME↗