Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.35216

Adaptive Resource Allocation for Effective and Efficient LLM Social Survey Simulation

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) enable scalable social survey simulation, yet existing pipelines typically use the same strong general-purpose model and a fixed, often large, respondent history for every respondent-question request. This uniform approach overlooks three factors. First, stronger models may rely on their own knowledge rather than respondent-specific evidence while costing more. Second, additional history can help when evidence is limited, but irrelevant responses may add noise and increase input length. Third, the preferred model and history budget can depend on each other. We propose E2Sim, an adaptive resource allocation framework that jointly selects a model and history budget for each request. Given a respondent persona, ranked response history, and target question, a lightweight policy predicts the accuracy and cost of each configuration and selects the most suitable one. We use respondent-history drop-and-swap augmentation to improve robustness to incomplete or variable histories, and a margin-based curriculum that progresses from easier allocation decisions to harder ones. Experiments on four real-world social survey datasets, multiple model pools, and different history-budget spaces show improvements over the oracle best-fixed configurations, with accuracy gains of up to 6.3 percentage points and cost reductions of up to 55.3 percent. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/E2Sim-DE66.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuanzi Li, Xueyang Feng, Junhao Wang, Lei Wang, Xu Chen. 2026-09-28. Adaptive Resource Allocation for Effective and Efficient LLM Social Survey Simulation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35216

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

A Safety-First Gateway Architecture for Trusted Public Health Resource Navigation

Conversational AI can improve access to public health information, but public-facing healthcare applications require safeguards against inappropriate medical guidance and unsupported generation. We present a Safety-First Science Gateway for maternal and child health (MCH) resource navigation that combines large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with a multi-layer safety architecture. The gateway integrates emergency handling, domain/scope screening, source attribution, anonymous session management, and operational audit logging while restricting retrieval to curated institutional resources. We describe the gateway architecture, prototype implementation, and functional verification of selected workflows. The current system provides resource provenance and safety-bounded navigation; it does not constitute a clinical decision-support system or automated claim-by-claim verification of generated health information. This work provides a reusable architectural framework for conversational navigation of curated public-health resources.

cs.CY↗

Greenpixie's AI Token Methodology: Assessing the Energy, Water and CO2-eq Impact of AI Tokens for Open and Closed Weight Models

We describe a methodology for estimating the per-token energy cost of cloud-hosted large language model (LLM) inference, separating between input (prefill) and output (decode) tokens. Graphics processing unit (GPU) energy usage is measured during inference benchmarking with open-weights models on a wide range of text-based tasks. The remaining server energy contribution from non-GPU hardware is estimated from the inference wall time. Bayesian linear regression is used to model the relationship between energy per token and LLM size, request traffic, and hardware deployment configuration. Proprietary frontier LLMs of unknown size and deployment are binned into size buckets based on naming conventions and performance priors, and the space of possible LLM configurations is sampled with Monte-Carlo methods to give a representative average energy per token and uncertainty. We also describe how these energy measurements can be used to estimate the carbon-dioxide equivalent ($\mathrm{CO_2\text{-}eq}$) emissions, both usage and embodied, and water consumed per token of AI inference. This methodology provides actionable data that enables reductions in cost, electricity usage, $\mathrm{CO_2\text{-}eq}$ emitted and water consumed in cloud and Software as a Service (SaaS).

cs.CY↗

Early Prediction of AI-Assisted Cheating Risk in Online Exams Through Learning Analytics

AI-assisted cheating has become an important threat to the security of online exams. This study examines whether the risk of AI-assisted cheating in the final exam can be predicted using students' digital traces in the learning management system (LMS) during the first eight weeks of the semester. The sample comprised 52 first-year undergraduates enrolled in a bachelor's program in Computer Education and Instructional Technology and taking an Introduction to Programming course at a public university in Turkiye. Students were labeled as low- or high-risk based on suspicious behaviors recorded in the final-exam logs, including copy, focus-loss, and right-click events. Of the 52 students, 23 (44.2%) were labeled as high-risk in a proctored, face-to-face exam. Group membership was then predicted using five features selected from 27 candidates extracted from students' digital traces. Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting algorithms were used to build the prediction models. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) with fold-specific preprocessing and feature selection. Logistic Regression achieved the best performance (Accuracy = 73.1%). The results indicate that LMS interaction data can provide an early signal of AI-assisted cheating risk. Course-module views, assignment submissions, and the number of days on which course videos were accessed were the most consistently selected features across the LOOCV folds. These predictions are intended to support timely academic guidance, not to establish misconduct or initiate disciplinary action.

cs.CY↗