Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.35385

Attentional DoS: Repeat Reposting, Collective Attention, and Information Diffusion on X

Abstract

Collective attention is a finite shared resource, and social media posts compete for limited opportunities to be seen. On X, users can undo a repost and repost it again. By repeating this cycle, a user can put the same post back into followers' timelines any number of times without making new content. We call this procedure repeat reposting, and we read it as placing repeated demand on this shared resource (Attentional DoS). We formalize this idea and explore repeat reposting in a large-scale dataset of cascades with at least 1,000 reactions, originating from posts classified as Japanese on X, covering April 2025 to March 2026. Repeat reposts are rare, appearing in a small share of all (user, post) pairs. Even so, close to a million posts have at least one repeater, and most repeats come from a small group of habitual accounts. The central result is that subsequent audience growth is associated less with the number of repeats than with the estimated reach of the repeating accounts. Through the lens of seriality, how habitually the same groups of accounts repeat reposts across many posts, a distinct distributed form emerges: several serial amplifiers converge on the same post (Attentional DDoS). Its synchrony, how closely their actions are timed together, forms a continuum from bursts on the scale of minutes to a daily clock. A check of the content of 99.7% of amplified posts shows that most ADDoS repeat events are directed at Chinese-script content, which our vocabulary matching and sample inspection indicate is predominantly commercial spam. Repeat reposting thus lets a post re-enter the competition for visibility. The observed pattern is better characterized as repeated temporal coverage of an existing audience and the self-reinforcement of posts that are already growing, rather than as evidence that repeat reposting takes reach from other content.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Genta Toya, Bruno T. Sugano, Kei Ichikawa, Qianyun Wu, Shuhei Saigusa, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Masashi Toyoda, Naoki Yoshinaga, Kazutoshi Sasahara. 2026-09-28. Attentional DoS: Repeat Reposting, Collective Attention, and Information Diffusion on X. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35385

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Influence Ranking Improvement via Link Addition in Social Networks

Social media platforms increasingly rely on influential users for information dissemination in domains such as marketing and political campaigns. As the value of being recognized as influential grows, users may have incentives to strategically enhance their influence. In this study, we investigate whether and to what extent the influence ranking of a target node can be improved by adding a limited number of outgoing links in the context of influence maximization (IM). We formulate the Link Selection Problem for Influence Ranking Improvement (LSP-IRI) as the problem of selecting a fixed-size set of additional outgoing links from a target node in order to maximize its rank improvement. To examine this problem, we consider two representative heuristic strategies: a greedy method that directly optimizes rank improvement and a computationally efficient random search method. We conduct experiments on four real-world networks ranging from thousands to hundreds of thousands of nodes. The results show that even a few added links can substantially improve IM-based influence rankings. In particular, the greedy method improves the ranks of nodes initially ranked around 50 by several tens of positions on average with only three added links, sometimes moving them into the top 10. The random search method achieves smaller gains under strict budgets but reduces computation time by up to approximately 98% compared with the greedy method and becomes effective when larger budgets are allowed. These findings show that IM-based influence rankings are sensitive to limited local structural modifications and highlight a trade-off between ranking improvement and computational efficiency.

cs.SI↗

Detection and Characterization of Coordinated Online Behavior: A Survey

Coordination is a fundamental aspect of life. The advent of social media has made it integral also to online human interactions, such as those that characterize thriving online communities and social movements. At the same time, coordination is also core to effective disinformation, manipulation, and hate campaigns. This survey collects, categorizes, and critically discusses the body of work produced as a result of the growing interest on coordinated online behavior. We reconcile industry and academic definitions, propose a comprehensive framework to study coordinated online behavior, and review and critically discuss the existing detection and characterization methods. Our analysis identifies open challenges and promising directions of research, serving as a guide for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers in understanding and addressing the complexities inherent to online coordination. We also provide an interactive companion website for exploring the surveyed literature.

cs.SI↗

The Game is the Game: Dynamic network analysis and shifting roles in criminal networks

Objectives: This paper incorporates time as a crucial variable to identify key players in criminal networks and explores how actors' positions change over time. It then assesses the accuracy of the results against the uncertainty around network data collected from criminal justice records. Methods: Network data are from a judicial document for a two-year investigation targeting a drug trafficking and distribution network. We use Katz centrality in its dynamic version to explore changes in relationships and relative importance of network actors. We then use a novel method of introducing new edges to the network using Bernoulli random trials to simulate missing data and assess the extent to which node rankings based on Katz centrality change or remain the same when introducing some level of uncertainty to our observed network. Results: We identify actors who consistently held a central role over the course of the two-year investigation and differentiate them from actors who provided key contributions to the group's activities, but only for a limited period. We show that compared to centrality measures commonly used in criminal network analysis, dynamic Katz centrality is helpful to differentiate individual contributions even among central nodes and explore individual trajectories over time, even when data are incomplete. Conclusions: This paper demonstrates the value of key player identification using temporal network data and offers an additional analytical tool to both organised crime scholars trying to capture the complex nature of criminal collaboration and law enforcement agencies aiming at identifying appropriate targets and disrupting criminal groups.

cs.SI↗