Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.35654

Guided Uncertainty-Aware Robust Domain Transfer

Abstract

Artificial intelligence models deployed as clinical decision support tools often suffer substantial performance degradation over time and across institutions due to covariate shift, concept drift, and cross-system heterogeneity. Fully retraining complex models is frequently infeasible, particularly in EHR settings where labeled outcome data are scarce and regulatory constraints limit model modification. We propose GUARD (Guided and Uncertainty-Aware Robustness to Domain shift), a unified statistical framework for updating an existing deployed model using limited labeled target data and multiple heterogeneous source populations while guarding against future distributional shifts. GUARD formulates robust multi-source transfer learning as a semi-supervised, adversarial optimization problem anchored at the current model, and employs double machine learning with cross-fitting to obtain debiased, efficient estimates that leverage abundant unlabeled target covariates. It then constructs an uncertainty-aware, guided group DRO estimator that combines source and target information while accounting for sampling variability in the source models. Our framework jointly provides principled robustness to domain shift, efficient semi-supervised estimation, and valid statistical inference for multi-source transfer of clinical prediction models. We demonstrate the utility of GUARD via extensive simulation experiments and a real world application to predicting future disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis from EHR data spanning more than a decade. GUARD recalibrates a pretrained model with only a small number of labeled records per year and remains accurate over multi-year horizons where target-only and standard transfer estimators degrade sharply.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xin Xiong, Zijian Guo, Tianxi Cai. 2026-09-28. Guided Uncertainty-Aware Robust Domain Transfer. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35654

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Univariate-Guided Interaction Modeling

We propose a procedure for sparse regression with pairwise interactions, by generalizing the Univariate Guided Sparse Regression (UniLasso) methodology. A central contribution is our introduction of TripletScan, which screens a pair $(j,k)$ using the coefficient of $X_jX_k$ in the local regression of the response on $1$, $X_j$, $X_k$, and $X_jX_k$. The retained products are incorporated either jointly with the main effects through UniLasso, yielding uniPairs, or after a first-stage main-effects fit, yielding uniPairs-2stage. For the UniLasso components of the procedures, we prove false-positive exclusion and uniform coefficient-error bounds. In simulations and an HIV drug-resistance application, the proposed procedures produce substantially smaller fitted models than competing interaction methods while retaining competitive predictive performance.

stat.ME↗

Factoring A-Optimality into D-Optimality and Sphericity

The D criterion measures the volume of the joint confidence ellipsoid for the linear model coefficients and ignores its shape, so designs with the same D value can estimate individual effects with different variances. Meanwhile, A-optimality minimizes average coefficient variance. With both criteria expressed as information values, A equals D multiplied by a sphericity index for the same ellipsoid. In a fixed coefficient basis, sphericity further factors into coefficient-variance balance and a determinant-based correlation component. In five published screening comparisons, the A-optimal design has a larger correlation component despite slightly poorer variance balance; in three it also has a smaller D value. In a seven-run family of designs that all tie under D, the two with equal coefficient variances have the lowest A value. Both sphericity components can be calculated directly from standard errors and estimate correlations available in statistical software. After whitening by a prediction moment matrix, the same determinant-sphericity factorization applies to the I-criterion.

stat.ME↗

Testing the equality of parameters in fixed and increasing dimension

This paper proposes a general and unified framework for testing the equality of a broad class of parameters, defined as a smooth function of expectations of symmetric kernels, across multiple independent populations. We consider two test statistics, a Wald-type statistic and an ANOVA-type statistic. The asymptotic distribution of the first one is derived under a fixed-dimension regime, whereas the second one is studied under both fixed and increasing-dimension regimes, where the parameter dimension diverges with the sample size. Based on these limiting distributions, we construct test procedures enabling asymptotically exact inference without parametric assumptions. Additionally, an alternative null distribution estimator based on a weighted bootstrap approximation is studied, which is applicable to the ANOVA-type statistic under a fixed-dimension regime. The finite-sample performance and computational efficiency of the proposed procedures are evaluated through an extensive simulation study and a real dataset application.

stat.ME↗