Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.35849

Counterexamples and gap phenomena for derived delooping levels

Abstract

Guo and Igusa introduced the derived and sub-derived delooping levels as refinements of the delooping level and asked how these two invariants compare, whether the derived delooping level always coincides with the opposite big finitistic dimension, and, if not, how large their difference can be. We answer these questions. First, we prove that every Artin algebra $A$ satisfies $\operatorname{ddell} A\leq \operatorname{sub-ddell} A$. This gives a positive answer to the ordinary-degree comparison problem, whereas a single explicit eight-dimensional algebra $C$ satisfies $k\text{-}\operatorname{sub-ddell} C=0<1=k\text{-}\operatorname{ddell} C$ for $k\geq 2$. We then compute, for every $k\geq 1$, all $k$-derived and $k$-sub-derived delooping levels of the monomial family of Barrios--Lanzilotta--Mata. In particular, that family satisfies $k\text{-}\operatorname{ddell} A_{n,s}=\operatorname{Findim}(A_{n,s}^{\mathrm{op}})$ for $k\geq 1$. In ordinary degree, this recovers an equality previously announced by Lam. We also construct a two-vertex, eleven-dimensional monomial algebra $Λ$, over an arbitrary field, such that $\operatorname{Findim}(Λ^{\mathrm{op}})=1<2=\operatorname{ddell}Λ=\operatorname{dell}Λ$. The same strict inequality is obtained by Gao, Liu and Xu using different algebras. A ten-dimensional non-monomial variant with a commutative corner algebra is also given. Finally, we construct a family of finite-dimensional monomial algebras $B_r$ satisfying $\operatorname{Findim}(B_r^{\mathrm{op}})=1$ and $\operatorname{ddell} B_r=2r+1$. Thus the difference $\operatorname{ddell} A-\operatorname{Findim}(A^{\mathrm{op}})$ is unbounded even among monomial algebras with fixed opposite big finitistic dimension.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Liang Chen. 2026-10-04. Counterexamples and gap phenomena for derived delooping levels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Archimedean period relations for Rankin-Selberg convolutions

We formulate and prove the archimedean period relations for Rankin-Selberg convolutions of $\text{GL}(n)\times \text{GL}(n)$ and $\text{GL}(n)\times \text{GL}(n-1)$, for all generic cohomological representations. As a consequence, we prove the non-vanishing of the archimedean modular symbols. This extends the earlier results in [LLS24] for essentially tempered representations of $\text{GL}(n)\times\text{GL}(n-1)$.

math.RT↗

Rational structures on quivers and a generalization of Gelfand's equivalence

We introduce the notion of rational structure on a quiver and associated representations to establish a coherent framework for studying quiver representations in separable field extensions. This notion is linked to a refinement of the notion of $K$-species, which we term étale $K$-species. We establish a categorical anti-equivalence between $K$-rational quivers and étale $K$-species, which extends to an equivalence of their respective representation categories. For $K$-rational quivers there is a canonical notion of base change, which suggests a corresponding notion of base change for (étale) $K$-species which we elaborate. As a primary application, we generalize Gelfand's celebrated equivalence between certain blocks of Harish-Chandra modules for $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ and representations of the Gelfand quiver to a rational setting. To this end, we define a $\mathbb{Q}$-rational structure on the Gelfand quiver and its representations. A key technical tool, which we call unipotent stabilization, is developed to construct the functor from rational Harish-Chandra modules to nilpotent rational quiver representations. We prove that this functor is an equivalence. A similar result is established for the cyclic quiver. Both results hold over every field $E$ of characteristic $0$, for suitable $E$-rational structures on the two quivers; for $E=\mathbb{C}$ they recover Gelfand's equivalence. In this rational framework the defining relation of the Gelfand quiver acquires a descent-theoretic meaning: its Galois orbit is stable, it descends to a single relation on the associated $\mathbb{Q}$-species, and a $\mathbb{Q}$-rational representation satisfies it if and only if the composite of the two arrows through the vertex $-$ is a $\mathbb{Q}$-rational endomorphism of the space at the central vertex. This allows us to recast our results in the language of $\mathbb{Q}$-species.

math.RT↗

Perverse filtration on the cohomology of affine Springer fibers

We show that the top cohomology of any affine Springer fiber, as a Weyl group representation, contains a large part of the total cohomology of certain Springer fibers. The main ingredient of the proof is the construction of a ``perverse filtration'' on the pure part of the cohomology of affine Springer fibers.

math.RT↗