Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.36325

MCMC-Free Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Generative Inference for Spatially Varying Coefficient Models at Scale

Abstract

Varying coefficient (VC) regression models have become indispensable tools in spatial data analysis, providing unmatched flexibility in capturing complex, nonlinear relationships and spatially-varying effects of predictors on responses. Although hierarchical Bayesian approaches offer a rigorous probabilistic framework for uncertainty quantification in VC modeling, their practical application to large-scale spatial datasets remains severely hindered by the scalability limitations of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms. In response, the past decade has seen substantial advances in developing more efficient hierarchical Bayesian VC models, primarily through substituting traditional Gaussian processes (GP) with computationally efficient stochastic surrogates for estimating unknown coefficient functions. This article introduces a fundamentally different approach: the Geostatistical Variational Auto-Encoder (GeoVAE), a hierarchical deep generative framework built specifically for joint estimation of multiple spatially varying coefficient functions. GeoVAE departs from both classical GP-based Bayesian models and standard variational auto-encoders (VAEs) in two key ways. First, it constructs a coefficient-specific auto-encoder for each coefficient function, allowing each to capture its own spatial resolution and smoothness. Second, a hierarchical synthesis layer integrates information across these auto-encoders to a shared auto-encoder, explicitly modeling cross-coefficient dependencies arising from the shared spatial domain. This design enables GeoVAE to recover complex spatial patterns at computational cost that scales favorably with sample size, without MCMC or explicit GP covariance representations. We characterize the advantages and limitations of GeoVAE relative to hierarchical Bayesian spatial models, demonstrating its strong potential for large-scale spatial analysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yeseul Jeon, Aaron Scheffler, Rajarshi Guhaniyogi. 2026-09-28. MCMC-Free Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Generative Inference for Spatially Varying Coefficient Models at Scale. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36325

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Delaunay Weighted Two-sample Test for High-dimensional Data by Incorporating Geometric Information

Two-sample hypothesis testing is a fundamental problem with various applications, which faces new challenges in the high-dimensional context. To mitigate the issue of the curse of dimensionality, high-dimensional data are typically assumed to lie on a low-dimensional manifold. To incorporate geometric information in the data, we propose to apply the Delaunay triangulation and develop the Delaunay weight to measure the geometric proximity among data points. In contrast to existing similarity measures that only utilize pairwise distances, the Delaunay weight can take both the distance and direction information into account. A detailed computation procedure is developed to learn the unknown manifold and approximate the Delaunay weight. We further propose a novel nonparametric test statistic using the Delaunay weight matrix. Asymptotic normality under the null and consistency under the alternative of the test statistic are developed. Applied to simulated data, the new test shows robustness to the learning of the unknown manifold and exhibits substantial power gain if the distributions differ in the principal directions of covariance matrices. The proposed test also detects significant differences on a real dataset of mice protein expression levels.

stat.ME↗

Randomization Tests in Switchback Experiments

Switchback experiments assign an experimental unit, such as a market or a platform, to treatment or control over successive blocks of time. Inference can be challenging because these experiments often contain only a small number of randomized blocks, while outcomes may exhibit serial dependence, seasonality, and treatment effects that persist across periods. We develop a conditional randomization test for the null of no total treatment effect that is finite-sample valid under standard assumptions on temporal interference without requiring a parametric model for outcomes. We also develop randomization tests for these assumptions: a carryover test that assesses whether past assignments continue to affect outcomes beyond a prespecified horizon and a non-anticipation test that assesses whether future assignments affect current outcomes. For hypotheses about average treatment effects, we establish asymptotic validity of studentized randomization tests under additional regularity conditions. Finally, we derive power approximations and characterize the tradeoffs between experimental design choices, the number of informative randomized comparisons, and statistical power. Numerical experiments with stylized potential outcomes and a dynamic rideshare model illustrate finite-sample performance and implications for experimental design.

stat.ME↗

Minimum Specification Perturbation: Robustness as Distance-to-Falsification in Causal Inference

Empirical causal claims depend on many analyst decisions, from selecting covariates to choosing estimators. Existing robustness tools summarize how results vary across these choices, but, to the best of our knowledge, do not answer: \textbf{How many analyst decisions must change to reach a specification, which is a set of choices, whose confidence interval (CI) contains zero?} We introduce \emph{Minimum Specification Perturbation (MSP)}, the smallest number of changes. MSP is small under the null, grows with effect strength and captures distance-to-falsification information that dispersion-based summaries cannot report; when making decisions under weak effects, an MSP-based rule yields lower false-positive rates than dispersion-based rules. We show that Fragility Index and MSP measure orthogonal vulnerabilities: fragility to influential observations need not imply fragility to specification choices. On the LaLonde benchmark, MSP = 1 implies that one decision change makes the CI contain zero. We further provide exact permutation calibration under randomization and characterize computation, showing tractable cases under additive structure and NP-hardness in general.

stat.ME↗