Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.36400

CAMEO: A Class-Activation-Mapped Equitable Overlay Framework for Fair and Robust Deep Learning-based Skin Condition Diagnosis

Abstract

Deep learning classifiers for dermoscopic skin lesions often reach high in-distribution accuracy while quietly relying on spurious background cues such as skin tone, device vignetting, and embedded rulers, rather than on lesion morphology. This undermines robustness and fairness across skin tones. This work asks whether Explainable AI (XAI), typically used only to audit a finished model, can instead be repurposed as an active training signal that corrects this shortcut without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. We introduce CAMEO (Class Activation Mapped Equitable Overlay), a framework that improves skin-lesion classification by selecting stable model explanations and using them to separate lesions from their backgrounds. It then replaces the background with realistic synthetic skin while keeping the lesion unchanged. On HAM10000 and dark-skin ISIC images, CAMEO maintained accuracy while reducing background-driven errors by nearly four times. It also made the model's attention more consistent when backgrounds changed. Results across multiple tests show that reducing reliance on background information improves robustness, with Fitzpatrick-based backgrounds providing a realistic and interpretable approach. Results show that XAI-guided augmentation can make dermoscopic classifiers measurably more robust and fair at no cost to accuracy. They also clarify that it is the mechanism and not the specific tone palette that matters, and that the lasting contribution of XAI here lies in stability-screened, annotation-free lesion localisation rather than in the robustness number itself.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Youssef Attia, Debasmita Mukherjee. 2026-09-28. CAMEO: A Class-Activation-Mapped Equitable Overlay Framework for Fair and Robust Deep Learning-based Skin Condition Diagnosis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36400

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Gen2-IC: Bridging Generative Models and Image Codecs through Latent Transport

Diffusion-based image compression has achieved strong perceptual quality at ultra-low bitrates. However, existing codecs are often tied to specific backbones and specialized components, making diverse, rapidly evolving generative models difficult to reuse. This raises a natural question: Can modern generative foundation models be connected to image compression through a simple and extensible interface? Two insights guide our design: stronger generative priors make a simpler codec interface viable, and generation and compression can be intrinsically linked through latent transport. We therefore propose Gen2-IC with two stages: (1) Latent Compression maps clean image latents to entropy-constrained latents; and (2) Latent Transport refines them with one near-terminal update based on the pretrained model. Gen2-IC requires neither auxiliary conditioning signals nor task-specific backbone modifications. With lightweight adaptation and no distillation, it supports fast encoding and one-step decoding across multiple bitrates. We validate Gen2-IC on SD-2.1, SANA-1.5, FLUX.1-dev, and Qwen-Image-2512, spanning U-Net and Transformer architectures as well as diffusion and flow-matching formulations. With stronger priors, Gen2-IC delivers gains below 0.05 bpp: the Qwen variant leads diffusion-based generative codecs in reconstruction fidelity (PSNR), perceptual similarity (LPIPS and DISTS), and recognizer-based semantic fidelity (OCR CER/WER and face-ROI similarity) across four benchmarks.

eess.IV↗

Unified-protocol voxel-level pulmonary embolism annotations for three public CT angiography datasets

Reliable clot-volume quantification and subsequent risk assessment in pulmonary embolism depend on precise segmentation of emboli on computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Deep learning models for this task must be trained on accurate voxel-level labels. The three public datasets that provide such labels were annotated under different protocols, and some of their studies contain unlabeled emboli or labels that are discontinuous across slices. This Data Descriptor presents voxel-level pulmonary embolism annotations for 149 of the 166 studies in these datasets. A primary rater drew all annotations under a single protocol. A thoracic radiologist with more than 20 years of experience reviewed and revised them. Three raters at three different centers independently annotated a subset of 15 studies. The subset was selected by source dataset and embolus location. Technical validation quantifies volumetric agreement with the source annotations, changes in within-mask attenuation, and inter-rater agreement on the subset. The dataset is intended to allow segmentation models to be developed and compared under a common reference standard.

eess.IV↗

Reliability Testing of Medical Model Performance under Distributed Deployment

Distributed inference has become an indispensable part of deploying medical models under practical latency, memory, and throughput constraints. Although modern frameworks improve serving efficiency through tensor parallelism, mixed precision, kernel fusion, and multi-device communication, they are generally assumed to preserve the behavior observed during centralized HuggingFace evaluation. This assumption creates an evaluation-deployment mismatch: a model may pass offline evaluation but produce a different output after the execution stack changes. To address this mismatch, we propose a testing framework and an improved, distributed-execution-sensitive medical-model benchmark that evaluates the same checkpoint and input under a centralized HuggingFace reference and matched distributed deployments. Extensive experiments across language, vision, and multimodal medical models show that execution changes can produce measurable output disagreements. Across supported visual settings, the test success rate ranges from 0.21 to 0.43 for single-modality models and from 0.32 to 0.98 for multimodal models. The benchmark is aimed at extending medical-model evaluation from capability and security to evaluation-deployment consistency.

eess.IV↗