Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.37063

Controller Identifiability: The Boundary Between Logarithmic and Square-Root Local Minimax Regret in Structured Adaptive LQR

Abstract

We study when logarithmic regret is attainable in structured adaptive linear-quadratic regulation. The state and input matrices depend affinely on a common unknown parameter. We consider neighborhoods of a known nominal model that is stabilizable and observable through the output associated with the state cost, with radii proportional to the inverse fourth root of the horizon. The key condition is controller identifiability, which requires the optimal gain derivative to vanish in every parameter direction that leaves the closed-loop dynamics unchanged under nominal optimal feedback. Under suitable regularity conditions on the noise density, this condition at the nominal parameter yields logarithmic local minimax regret when the gain derivative there is nonzero. Failure of the condition yields square-root local minimax regret. If the nominal gain derivative vanishes, local minimax regret remains bounded. We prove that controller identifiability is equivalent to the optimal gain remaining unchanged under sufficiently small invisible perturbations of the nominal model. Motivated by this invariance, we construct a certainty-equivalent policy that estimates only the visible parameter component and attains the logarithmic upper bound under controller identifiability. The policy requires neither the horizon nor the noise law, and its guarantee holds for independent, identically distributed noise with zero mean and finite positive definite covariance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhaobo Liu. 2026-09-29. Controller Identifiability: The Boundary Between Logarithmic and Square-Root Local Minimax Regret in Structured Adaptive LQR. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37063

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Adaptive Extremum Seeking Control via the RMSprop Optimizer

Extremum Seeking Control (ESC) is a well-known set of continuous time algorithms for model-free optimization of a cost function. One issue for ESCs is the convergence rates of parameters to extrema of unknown cost functions. The local convergence rate depends on the second, or sometimes higher, order derivatives of the unknown cost function. To mitigate this dependency, we propose the use of the RMSprop optimizer for ESCs as RMSprop is an adaptive gradient-based optimizer which attempts to have a normalized convergence rate in all parameters. Practical stability results are given for this RMSprop ESC (RMSpESC). In particular notability, the proof of practical stability uses Lyapunov function based on observed contracting, attractive sets. Versions of this Lyapunov function could be applied to other areas of applications, in particular for interconnected systems.

math.OC↗

A deterministic optimization algorithm for nonconvex and combinatorial bi-objective programming

Many practical multiobjective optimization (MOO) problems include discrete decision variables and/or nonlinear model equations and exhibit disconnected or smooth but nonconvex Pareto surfaces. Scalarization methods, such as the weighted-sum and sandwich (SD) algorithms, are common approaches to solving MOO problems but may fail on nonconvex or discontinuous Pareto fronts. In the current work, motivated by the well-known normal boundary intersection (NBI) method and the SD algorithm, we present SDNBI, a new algorithm for bi-objective optimization (BOO) designed to address the theoretical and numerical challenges associated with the reliable solution of general nonconvex and discrete BOO problems. The main improvements in the algorithm are the effective exploration of the nonconvex regions of the Pareto front and, uniquely, the early identification of regions where no additional Pareto solutions exist. The performance of the SDNBI algorithm is assessed based on the accuracy of the approximation of the Pareto front constructed over the disconnected nonconvex objective domains. The new algorithm is compared with two MOO approaches, the modified NBI method and the SD algorithm, using published benchmark problems. The results indicate that the SDNBI algorithm outperforms the modified NBI and SD algorithms in solving convex, nonconvex-continuous, and combinatorial problems, both in terms of computational cost and of the overall quality of the Pareto-optimal set, suggesting that the SDNBI algorithm is a promising alternative for solving BOO problems.

math.OC↗

ICNN-enhanced 2SP: Leveraging input convex neural networks for solving two-stage stochastic programming

Two-stage stochastic programming (2SP) offers a basic framework for modelling decision-making under uncertainty, yet scalability remains a challenge due to the computational complexity of recourse function evaluation. Existing learning-based methods like Neural Two-Stage Stochastic Programming (Neur2SP) employ neural networks (NNs) as recourse function surrogates but rely on computationally intensive mixed-integer programming (MIP) formulations. We propose ICNN-enhanced 2SP, a method that leverages Input Convex Neural Networks (ICNNs) to exploit linear programming (LP) representability in convex 2SP problems. By architecturally enforcing convexity and enabling exact inference through LP, our approach eliminates the need for integer variables inherent in the conventional MIP-based formulation while retaining an exact embedding of the ICNN surrogate within the 2SP framework. This results in a more computationally efficient alternative, and we show that good solution quality can be maintained. Comprehensive experiments reveal that ICNNs incur only marginally longer training times while achieving validation accuracy on par with their standard NN counterparts. Across benchmark problems, ICNN-enhanced 2SP often exhibits considerably faster solution times than the MIP-based formulations while preserving solution quality, with these advantages becoming significantly more pronounced as problem scale increases. For the most challenging instances, the method achieves speedups of up to 100$\times$ with solution quality superior to MIP-based formulations.

math.OC↗