Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.37641

Rhythm Is a Dancer: Designing Interactive Rhythm Feedback for Beginner Dancers

Bettina Eska·Annika Kilian·Paweł W. Woźniak·Jakob Karolus
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Learning how to dance can readily overwhelm beginners, especially without effective guidance from a dance teacher. Existing interactive systems often do not sufficiently support the learner's progress. We investigated how targeted feedback on rhythm keeping interactively supports dance practice for novice dancers by introducing SkeletonDance. Our design is grounded in motor learning theory and conceptualized through interviews with dance teachers, following established teaching strategies. SkeletonDance automatically detects rhythm flaws and provides assistance through mimicking clapping feedback, a common instructional technique in dance lessons. In our study, participants reported that SkeletonDance helped them to re-establish lost rhythm and increased confidence during practice, especially among novices. Though objective performance metrics did not consistently confirm these effects during controlled test sessions. Our work highlights that feedback can support novice dancers' subjective practicing experiences and demonstrates how prior dancing experience moderates the objective effectiveness of such minimal, teacher-inspired interventions.

Explore related subjects

cs.HC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bettina Eska, Annika Kilian, Paweł W. Woźniak, Jakob Karolus. 2026-09-29. Rhythm Is a Dancer: Designing Interactive Rhythm Feedback for Beginner Dancers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37641

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

"AI Psychosis" in Context: How Conversation History Shapes LLM Responses to Delusional Beliefs

Extended interaction with large language models (LLMs) has been linked to the reinforcement of delusional beliefs, attracting clinical and public concern. Yet most empirical work evaluates model safety in brief interactions, which may not reflect how harms develop through sustained dialogue. Five LLMs were tested across three levels of accumulated context, using the same escalating delusional conversation history to isolate its effect on model behaviour. Responses were coded on risk and safety dimensions, and each model was analysed qualitatively. Models separated into two distinct tiers: GPT-4o, Grok 4.1 Fast, and Gemini 3 Pro exhibited high-risk, low-safety profiles; Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.2 Instant displayed the opposite pattern. As context accumulated, performance degraded in the unsafe group, while the same material activated stronger safety interventions among safer models. Qualitative analysis identified distinct mechanisms of failure, including validating the user's delusional premises, elaborating beyond them with new content, and attempting harm reduction from within the delusional frame. Safer models, however, often used the established relationship to support intervention, challenging delusional beliefs and directing the user to external support. These findings indicate that accumulated context functions as a stress test of safety architecture, revealing whether prior dialogue is treated as a worldview to inherit or evidence to evaluate. Short-context assessments may therefore mischaracterise model safety, underestimating danger in some systems while missing context-activated gains in others. The results suggest that delusion reinforcement is a tractable alignment failure, with safer models establishing a baseline that future systems should now be expected to meet.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Afterglow: A Place-Based Memorial Ecology for AI-Mediated Pet Bereavement

Pet bereavement often receives little social recognition. Generative AI can give a continuing bond a responsive voice, but a comforting reply may also claim authority to forgive or request attention. We investigate how a memorial can support connection without turning remembrance into obligation. Through Research through Design, we developed Afterglow, a mobile world connecting private remembrance, human witnessing, and symbolic Pet messages. A formative survey (N=57) informed the initial design, followed by six online roundtable walkthroughs with 20 unique participants across two prototype iterations. Our interpretive analysis develops tensions between returnable connection and emotional obligation, recognizable likeness and ontological clarity, and protective intervention and surveillant authority. We contribute Legible Restraint, a cross-layer requirement that limits on relational authority survive changes in speaker, generation context, trigger logic, data use, and participation. Its temporal consequence, Designing for Goodbye, keeps remembrance available without making continued use a condition of care.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

Where the Evidence Lives: Auditing AI Companions' Self-Descriptions

Companion agents describe themselves: they remember, they understand their users, the relationship has changed them. We argue that such accounts, and the experience ratings that seem to confirm them, are checkable by users only where the evidence is theirs: in the agent's behavior, or in themselves. Where the evidence lives in the machinery, fluent self-description and moderately positive ratings do not establish that the mechanisms behind them ran. We demonstrate an audit procedure that sets an agent's self-description against its users' judgements and its implementation records, reporting each claim as supported, contradicted, or unresolved, and apply it to Lita, a proactive companion we built and deployed for a month with nine colleagues. Participants endorsed stylistic claims, withheld endorsement from relational ones, and rated memory at or above midpoint, while two of three memory layers had never executed their accumulation step. Memory-bearing agents should report what their self-descriptions cannot establish.

cs.HC↗