Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.38628

A rainbow partition theorem for trees and connected maximin share allocations of chores

Abstract

Xiao, Qiu, and Huang (AAMAS 2023) and independently Lonc (personal communication) asked whether indivisible chores located at the vertices of a tree can always be allocated to $n$ agents in connected bundles so that the cost of every agent is at most its connected maximin share; for goods, this is a theorem of Bouveret, Cechlárová, Elkind, Igarashi, and Peters. We answer the question affirmatively, even for monotone costs. The answer follows from a combinatorial theorem: if $\mathcal P_1,\ldots,\mathcal P_k$ are partitions of the vertex set of a finite tree, each into at most $k$ connected parts, then the vertex set can be split into disjoint sets $B_1,\ldots,B_k$, some possibly empty, such that each nonempty $B_i$ is connected and contained in a part of $\mathcal P_i$. Equivalently, if each of $k$ colours occurs on at most $k-1$ edges of a tree, then the vertices can be partitioned into connected sets labelled by distinct colours, none containing an edge of its own colour; in particular, one can choose for every colour a component of the forest obtained by deleting that colour so that the chosen components cover the tree. The bound is already best possible for paths, and for additive costs, the theorem is equivalent to the fair-division statement. The proof reduces the problem to inward partitions of oriented trees, which we obtain from the colourful KKM theorem on a simplex of edge weights, using a leaf-elimination labelling that remains compatible when weights vanish. We also give an algorithm running in time $k^{O(k)}$ plus polynomial time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marcin Anholcer, Maciej Bartkowiak, Bartłomiej Bosek, Jarosław Grytczuk, Zbigniew Lonc, Paweł Rzążewski. 2026-09-29. A rainbow partition theorem for trees and connected maximin share allocations of chores. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.38628

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Domination polynomial of co-maximal graphs of integer modulo ring

We investigate the domination polynomial of the co-maximal graph $Γ(\mathbb{Z}_n)$ related to the ring of integers modulo $n$. Such a polynomial encodes domination sets of all possible sizes, a NP-hard problem for general graph. We give exact formulas for prime powers, integers with two distinct prime divisors, and products of three distinct primes. A prime-support decomposition gives a finite explicit formula for arbitrary $n$, including repeated prime factors. Further results determine the highest coefficients, the precise threshold beyond which every vertex subset dominates, and the number of non-dominating subsets. We discuss unimodality and log-concavity, and derive justified bounds for nonzero domination roots using the Eneström--Kakeya theorem.

math.CO↗

On gcd-graphs over matrix rings

Graphs defined over finite rings are well studied in the literature. The study of these graphs benefits from rich connections between several areas of mathematics, including number theory, algebra, combinatorics, and graph theory, and these connections often lead to interesting interactions between algebraic and combinatorial structures. In this article, we investigate gcd-graphs defined over matrix rings with coefficients in finite fields. We show that these graphs exhibit several interesting graph-theoretic properties. Along the way, we also prove some results on the structure of matrix rings, which may be of independent interest.

math.CO↗

A solution to a conjecture on the signless Laplacian spectral radius for $t$-color-critical graphs

An induced matching is a matching that forms an induced subgraph. A graph is $t$-color-critical if removing some induced matching of size $t$ lowers its chromatic number, but removing any $t-1$ vertices does not. Let $F$ be a $t$-color-critical graph with $χ(F)=r+1$. For sufficiently large $n$, Simonovits determined the unique edge-extremal $F$-free graph on $n$ vertices. Recently, Zheng, Li and Li [Linear Algebra Appl.\ 730 (2026) 546--565] conjectured that, for $t\ge 2$ and $r\ge 3$, the join $K_{t-1}\vee T_{n-t+1,r}$ uniquely maximizes the signless Laplacian spectral radius among all $n$-vertex $F$-free graphs when $n$ is sufficiently large. In this paper, we prove this conjecture. In contrast to the usual spectral arguments, our proof of this conjecture relies on two techniques of a rather different flavour. Our first technique is an analogue of Zykov symmetrization for the signless Laplacian matrix. Our second technique is an induction on $n$, from which we obtain the lower bound on the smallest entry of the Perron vector of a signless Laplacian spectral extremal graph rather than a structural statement.

math.CO↗