Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.39212

Minimax Additive Regression under Unknown Dependent Designs

Baptiste Ferrere·Fabrice Gamboa·Jean-Michel Loubes
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study additive regression under a potentially non-product random design on $[0,1]^d$, allowing the dimension $d$ to grow with the sample size $n$. We introduce coupled smoothness classes that separately control the regularity of the marginal densities and the density-weighted additive components. To handle dependence, we adapt a Riesz-basis construction for functional ANOVA models and establish compatibility bounds with constants independent of the dimension under uniform bounds on the joint density. We construct thresholded least-squares estimators and establish matching minimax upper and lower bounds for prediction with known or unknown marginal densities, under suitable dimension-growth conditions. When the marginal densities are at least as smooth as the weighted components, the unknown-density problem attains the known-density minimax rate. When the densities are less smooth, their regularity determines the minimax rate over the coupled class. Finally, we show that the centered additive components can be recovered at the same aggregate upper rate, without an additional order of error.

Explore related subjects

stat.MLcs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Baptiste Ferrere, Fabrice Gamboa, Jean-Michel Loubes. 2026-09-30. Minimax Additive Regression under Unknown Dependent Designs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Provable FDR Control for Deep Feature Selection: Deep MLPs and Beyond

We develop a flexible feature selection framework based on deep neural networks that approximately controls the false discovery rate (FDR), a measure of Type-I error. The method applies to architectures whose first layer is fully connected. From the second layer onward, it accommodates multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) of arbitrary width and depth, convolutional and recurrent networks, attention mechanisms, residual connections, and dropout. The procedure also accommodates stochastic gradient descent with data-independent initializations and learning rates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to provide a theoretical guarantee of FDR control for feature selection within such a general deep learning setting. Our analysis is built upon a multi-index data-generating model and an asymptotic regime in which the feature dimension $n$ diverges faster than the latent dimension $q^{*}$, while the sample size, the number of training iterations, the network depth, and hidden layer widths are left unrestricted. Under this setting, we show that each coordinate of the gradient-based feature-importance vector admits a marginal normal approximation, thereby supporting the validity of asymptotic FDR control. As a theoretical limitation, we assume $\mathbf{B}$-right orthogonal invariance of the design matrix, and we discuss broader generalizations. We also present numerical experiments that underscore the theoretical findings.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

BalLOT: Balanced $k$-means clustering with optimal transport

We consider the fundamental problem of balanced $k$-means clustering. In particular, we introduce an optimal transport approach to alternating minimization called BalLOT, and we show that it delivers a fast and effective solution to this problem. We establish this with several theoretical guarantees and a variety of numerical experiments. On the theory front, we first prove that for generic data, BalLOT produces integral couplings at each step. Next, we perform a landscape analysis to provide theoretical guarantees for both exact and partial recoveries of planted clusters under the stochastic ball model. We also propose initialization schemes that achieve one-step recovery of planted clusters. To conclude, we present numerical experiments that corroborate our theoretical results.

stat.ML↗
arXiv2026

The Exceedance Design Effect: Effective Sample Size for Thresholds under Clustering

Suppose we want a cutoff that 90% of a population falls below. We estimate it from a sample, and another sample would give a different cutoff and a different fraction below it. We ask how much that fraction varies when observations come in independent groups, such as pupils in classrooms or sentences in news articles. We prove that grouping multiplies its large-sample variance by $1+(m-1)ρ_I(p)$, where $m$ is the group size, $p$ is the target fraction, and $ρ_I(p)$ measures whether two members of a group fall on the same side of the cutoff. That correlation can differ from the correlation between the scores themselves, and it changes with the target. We give a direct proof, a counterexample to using score correlation, and an extension to unequal group sizes. A dataset therefore does not have one effective sample size. How much information it contains depends on the question you ask. In our document experiment, the same 1,000 rows carried about 217 independent observations' worth of information at the median. At the 95th percentile, they carried about 621. Nothing about the dataset changed. We asked it a different question. The number of rows is a property of the dataset. The effective sample size belongs to the analysis.

stat.ML↗