Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2609.40204

Attraction to hierarchical feature memory explains orientation bias

Abstract

When recalling the orientation of recent stimuli, observers are systematically biased away from the cardinal axes. The prevailing explanation is that this ''anti-cardinal bias'' arises because cardinal orientations are encoded with greater neural resources and therefore less noise, consistent with efficient coding of environmentally common features. Under this account, the bias should occur independently for each stimulus; any serial attraction towards previously seen orientations should be independent of absolute orientation. By contrast, we find that serial effects in orientation recall are unexpectedly strong and reflect a hitherto unrecognised hierarchical interaction, consistent with recurrent connectivity across hierarchies of sensory processing in the brain. We found that serial dependence in visual orientation recall is dominated not by attraction to the previous orientation itself, but to a compound feature representing both a tilt and its mirror reflection about the cardinal axes. Consistent with greater spatial abstraction at higher levels, the influence of this compound feature persisted across the visual midline, whereas orientation-specific effects weakened between hemifields. We developed a quantitative model based on the optimal combination of a noisy representation of the current stimulus with a hierarchical memory trace incorporating these compound features. Remarkably, although the coding fidelity was uniform across angles, this model accurately reproduced not only the serial dependence, but also the anti-cardinal bias. Our results suggest that memory traces are not isolated to single features, but reflect compound reactivation of hierarchical representations. Furthermore, they reveal that inference across hierarchical representations can generate systematic perceptual distortions previously ascribed to coding constraints.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kira Michaela Düsterwald, Peter Vincent, Ana Kapros, Athena Akrami, Maneesh Sahani. 2026-09-30. Attraction to hierarchical feature memory explains orientation bias. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.40204

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Neural spikes as rare events

We consider the information transmission problem in neurons and its possible implications for learning in neural networks. Our approach is based on recent developments in statistical physics and complexity science. Combining sensory information from various modalities for perceptual decision-making offers several advantages and is essential for the survival of both humans and animals. Not much is known about which brain regions are involved in spatial localization using audiovisual integration. We explore this further by training mice in a task requiring audiovisual integration. We then record from the secondary motor cortex (M2) using high-density electrophysiology. Analyzing this data, we found neurons responsive to multimodal as well as unimodal auditory and visual stimuli. The neurons are generally more responsive to auditory, rather than visual, stimuli. There was low correlation between the auditory and visual responses. Some neurons were sensitive to the task mode, whether active or passive, with more neurons being responsive in the active mode. A relatively large percentage of neurons (10-11%) differed significantly in their response to left and right-sided auditory stimuli, but only in 1 of the 3 mice we recorded from. These findings suggest a role for M2 in multisensory decision making and should enable further research in this field. We then use branching process simulations to model neural activity. This would support temporal coding theory as a model for neural coding.

q-bio.NC↗

NeuroAI and Beyond: Bridging Between Advances in Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence

Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have made impressive progress in recent years but remain only loosely interconnected. Based on a workshop convened by the National Science Foundation in August 2025, we identify three fundamental capability gaps in current AI: the inability to interact with the physical world, inadequate learning that produces brittle systems, and unsustainable energy and data inefficiency. We describe the neuroscience principles that address each: co-design of body and controller, prediction through interaction, multi-scale learning with neuromodulatory control, hierarchical distributed architectures, and sparse event-driven computation. We present a research roadmap organized around these principles at near, mid, and long-term horizons. We argue that realizing this program requires a new generation of researchers trained across the boundary between neuroscience and engineering, and describe the institutional conditions: interdisciplinary training, hardware access, community standards, and ethics, needed to support them. We conclude that NeuroAI, neuroscience-informed artificial intelligence, has the potential to overcome limitations of current AI while deepening our understanding of biological neural computation.

q-bio.NC↗

Single-turn emergency psychiatric triage across 15 frontier AI chatbots

People increasingly turn to general-purpose AI chatbots for advice about emotional and mental health problems, but the ability of these systems to recognize and appropriately triage psychiatric emergencies remains under-characterized. We evaluated psychiatric triage performance in 15 frontier AI chatbots using 112 clinical vignettes spanning four urgency levels, from routine care to immediate emergency assessment. In each trial (1680 total), a chatbot received a single user message conveying all triage-relevant information from one vignette and recommended a timeframe for care. The primary outcome was emergency under-triage; secondary outcomes included triage accuracy and the direction of errors. Vignettes and user messages were generated using a clinician-verified LLM pipeline. Across 415 emergency trials, 23 were under-triaged (5.5%; 95% CI 1.8-15.9). Overall accuracy, averaged across urgency levels, ranged from 42.0% to 71.8% across chatbots and was lowest for intermediate cases (19.6%; 95% CI 11.7-28.1). Every chatbot showed a net over-triage bias; overall, 763 of 786 incorrect assignments (97.1%) were more urgent than the prespecified triage level. The error pattern was similar when predictions were assessed against clinician ratings: 35 of 430 trials involving vignettes rated as emergencies by at least 75% of clinicians were under-triaged (8.1%). AI chatbots recognized most psychiatric emergencies but still missed clinically important cases and frequently over-triaged less urgent presentations. Further evaluations should examine how triage performance changes when clinically relevant information must be elicited through conversation.

q-bio.NC↗