Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.00441

Quantum Secret Sharing and Error Correction vs No-Cloning

Abstract

Secret sharing is ubiquitous throughout cryptography. All possible access structures are classically feasible, and in the case of threshold access structures, the protocols are even very efficient. However, when moving to the quantum setting, the no-cloning theorem shows that many access structures are impossible. In fact, no-cloning exactly characterizes feasibility: for thresholds, quantum secret sharing is possible if and only if the threshold $t$ is strictly more than $n/2$. In this work, we propose a variant of quantum secret sharing (QSS) where two or more identical copies of the input state are provided, but the output is only required to recover one copy. This notion circumvents the simple one-copy no-cloning obstruction, though the natural $k$-copy generalization still gives much milder obstructions. For thresholds using $k$ copies, no-cloning implies that QSS is impossible whenever $t\leq n/(k+1)$. It is tempting to hypothesize that no-cloning continues to exactly characterize the many-copy case. However, we show that this is not the case. We give positive results showing that multiple copies allow for going slightly beyond the single-copy obstruction: for thresholds, we construct QSS whenever $t>(n-k+1)/2$. On the other hand, we give a novel obstruction we call the Clique Path obstruction, which applies to arbitrary access structures. For thresholds, it shows that QSS is impossible whenever $t\leq (n-1)/k$. Our upper and lower bounds exactly match for $k=2$. Both our results leverage connections to the $k$-colorability of certain graphs derived from the access structure. We leave closing the gap for $k\geq 3$ copies as a fascinating direction for future work. Secret sharing is closely related to error correction, which can also be considered in the many-copy setting. Our results imply similar obstructions for quantum error correction for erasure channels.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Steven Chien, Ishani Mukherjee, Mark Zhandry. 2026-09-30. Quantum Secret Sharing and Error Correction vs No-Cloning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00441

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Everlasting secure key agreement from a quantum computational hybrid security model

We introduce the Quantum Computational Timelock (QCT) model, combining time-lock encryption with a quantitative noisy-quantum-storage assumption. Time-lock encryption gives Bob immediate access to the encoding seed and gives Eve the same final information as access to that seed only after a protected interval. Eve may then process her retained information without computational restriction. We state this delayed-access encryption assumption explicitly and construct MUB-QCT from a complete set of mutually unbiased bases in dimension $d$ and an affine pair-wise independent permutation family. For single-copy encoding, every seed-independent immediate measurement has trace-distance advantage at most $1/(2\sqrt{d+1})$ and mutual information at most $1/(d+1)$. Effective residual storage at diamond distance at most $δ$ from replacement adds at most $δ$ to the individual-attack distinguishing bound. Under i.i.d. individual attacks and entropy-preserving acceptance, we obtain an asymptotic key-rate bound and formulate final-key secrecy in composable trace distance. For $m$ independently randomized signals sharing one bit and seed, the optimal leakage under non-adaptive product measurements is $\min\{1,m/(d+1)\}$, allowing a linear-in-$d$ detection enhancement in that attack model. We also construct a seed-independent joint measurement that recovers the bit after disclosure with error at most $\varepsilon$ from $O(\log d+\log(1/\varepsilon))$ signals, retaining only classical information after measurement. This gives a quantitative separation between product and joint measurements. Bob uses two logical detection outcomes independently of $d$.

quant-ph↗

Linear optics and the problem of Bell-like state discrimination

A linear optics-based scheme to implement various quantum information processing tasks is of paramount importance due to its ease of implementation and low noise. Many information-theoretic tasks depend on the successful discrimination of Bell states. A no-go theorem states that it is not possible to perfectly discriminate among the four Bell states when the measurement apparatus is restricted to linear optical elements. The success probability is only $50\%$. Using extra resources such as hyperentanglement, ancillary entanglement, and even a minimum amount of non-linearity, complete Bell-state discrimination can be achieved. The success probability for Bell-like state discrimination is only $25\%$. Bell-like states are non-maximally entangled two-qubit states that resemble Bell states in structure but have unequal Schmidt coefficients. We find that this can be boosted to $50\%$ using hyperentanglement, where extra ancillary degrees of freedom (DOF) of photons, such as polarization, momentum, or OAM, are also entangled along with the system DOF. This contrasts with Bell-state discrimination, where $100\%$ can be achieved. Furthermore, we find that using correlations in the photons' arrival times, all four Bell states can be distinguished with $100\%$ success probability, while for Bell-like state discrimination, it increases only to $37.5\%$ from $25\%$. We observe a similar contrast when using ancillary entangled photons. While the success probability for discriminating all four Bell states increases as $1-\frac{1}{2^N}$, where $N$ is the number of ancillary photon pairs, for Bell-like states, it depends on the state parameters and can be less than $25\%$ in some cases. Also, adding further ancillary photons decreases the success probability. We then show that using non-linear gadgets, namely SFG, $100\%$ success probability can be achieved even for Bell-like state discrimination.

quant-ph↗

Memory-Augmented Hybrid Quantum Reservoir Computing

Reservoir computing (RC) is an effective method for predicting chaotic systems by using a high-dimensional dynamic reservoir with fixed internal weights, while keeping the learning phase linear, which simplifies training and reduces computational complexity compared to fully trained recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Quantum reservoir computing (QRC) uses the exponential growth of Hilbert spaces in quantum systems, allowing for greater information processing, memory capacity, and computational power. However, the original QRC proposal requires coherent injection of inputs multiple times, complicating practical implementation. We present a hybrid quantum-classical approach that implements memory through classical post-processing of quantum measurements. This approach avoids the need for multiple coherent input injections and is evaluated on benchmark tasks, including the chaotic Mackey-Glass time series prediction. We tested our model on two physical platforms: a fully connected Ising model and a Rydberg atom array. The optimized model demonstrates promising predictive capabilities, achieving a higher number of steps compared to previously reported approaches.

quant-ph↗