Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.00764

Teaching a plasma physics and engineering class at a liberal arts college using Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs)

Abstract

Undergraduate research experiences provide students with an opportunity to apply knowledge learned in the classroom to authentic scientific problems. In this work, we describe the development of a special-topics course in Plasma Physics and Engineering (PPE) at a small liberal arts college using a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs). During the first half of the semester, students learned fundamental plasma physics and dusty plasma concepts through traditional lectures and homework. During the second half, they applied this knowledge to investigate an unanswered research question: why does the levitation time of growing nanoparticles decrease in the presence of a magnetic field? Students learned and used Langmuir probe and optical emission spectroscopy diagnostics to characterize an argon plasma over a range of magnetic-field strengths. Their measurements showed a general decrease in electron density with increasing magnetic field strength, while optical emission measurements confirmed a reduction in carbonaceous nanoparticle growth-cycle time from acetylene. Using the measured plasma parameters, students estimated the nanoparticle charge and developed the hypothesis that a reduction in electron density leads to a smaller negative dust charge and consequently a weaker electric force available to levitate the particles as a function of increasing magnetic field strength between 50 and 330 Gauss. Students subsequently disseminated their results through research poster presentations at conferences. Course evaluations and E-CLASS responses also indicated positive student experiences with the laboratory and research components of the course. This work demonstrates one approach for integrating plasma physics education and authentic research in an undergraduate curriculum at a small liberal arts institution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bhavesh Ramkorun. 2026-09-30. Teaching a plasma physics and engineering class at a liberal arts college using Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs). https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00764

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Determining the degree of randomness in multiple-choice question distractors

Multiple-choice questions are a staple of educational assessment due to their efficiency, but their diagnostic ability is inherently limited. Traditional psychometric techniques infer misconceptions by fitting models to predetermined data patterns, making them ineffective for analysing small, novel, or non-standardised samples where such prior trends are absent. To address this, we introduce a new distractor analysis method based on Information Theory, which treats the randomness in incorrect answers not as noise but as a measurable signal in student answer patterns. By examining the entropy of distractor choices alongside overall accuracy, our approach offers a sample-sized-independent framework for classifying performance. Cross-referencing low-scoring item-level response data against independently documented misconceptions on a standard mechanics inventory shows that, for items identified as most concentrated (lowest degree of randomness), a majority of incorrect responses select the exact response coded to that item's named, interview-validated misconception. Furthermore, items independently flagged elsewhere as diagnostically unreliable are exactly the items the measure identifies as having the highest degree of randomness. The pedagogically actionable cases are those with low degree of randomness in a class's incorrect answers, signalling a shared, re-teachable misconception, whereas a high degree of randomness chiefly serves as the null case against which that concentration is judged. Our analysis is intended as a fast, single-administration triage step: a practical, theory-driven complement to established distractor-analysis methods that helps instructors flag which items warrant closer, more resource-intensive investigation.

physics.ed-ph↗

AI-based scoring systematically underestimates conceptual understanding of linguistically weak students' explanations in physics

Students' explanations of scientific phenomena provide important evidence of their conceptual understanding. However, because conceptual understanding can only be inferred through language rather than observed directly, distinguishing conceptual understanding from linguistic quality represents a fundamental challenge for assessment. This challenge can also be expected to arise when artificial intelligence (AI) is used to score students' text-based explanations. We investigated whether AI-based scoring approaches assess students' conceptual understanding independently of the linguistic quality of their explanations about a phenomenon taken from a physics context. Conceptual understanding scores assigned by nine machine learning-based scoring approaches and two large language model-based scoring approaches were compared with expert-assigned scores for 116 explanations produced by secondary-school students in Germany. Multinomial logistic regression analyses examined whether expert-rated linguistic quality was associated with under- or overestimation of conceptual understanding. Across all eleven AI-based scoring approaches, lower linguistic quality was associated with a greater likelihood of underestimation, although the strength and statistical significance of this association varied between approaches. AI-based scoring approaches may thus systematically underestimate the conceptual understanding expressed in linguistically weaker explanations. This pattern resembles language bias previously documented in STEM teachers' assessment practices. The findings highlight the importance of examining not only agreement with expert ratings but also whether AI-based scoring approaches inadvertently rely on construct-irrelevant information. Addressing language bias is therefore essential for the validity and fairness of AI-supported assessment in physics education and STEM education more broadly.

physics.ed-ph↗

Community agreements pedagogy in physics

The idea of engaging critically and creatively with physics theories is a stretch for many physicists and physics educators. Most physicists become enculturated into the belief that physics definitions, laws, and equations are read from the book of nature. However, this belief obscures how theories are collectively negotiated by people in specific socio-political and personal conditions, and how students' particular ideas and intuitions will inevitably shape their own practice of science. To help students build their skills for collective theory-building, we suggest a pedagogy for physics in which students actively negotiate the laws and definitions of theories.

physics.ed-ph↗