arXiv · 2610.01645
Beyond Demographic Balance: Multi-Metric and Intersectional Evaluation of Fairness in MIMIC-IV Mortality Prediction
Abstract
Fairness conclusions in clinical prediction can depend strongly on both the metrics reported and the demographic resolution at which performance is evaluated. We revisit these evaluation choices for ICU mortality prediction on MIMIC-IV, comparing predictive-utility and subgroup-error metrics across several fairness interventions. As a complementary case study, we introduce a lightweight adaptation strategy that jointly balances ethnicity--gender--insurance representation without conditioning on mortality outcomes, allowing demographic representation balancing to be examined separately from outcome-conditioned or direct error-rate interventions. We evaluate its behavior at both marginal and corresponding three-way intersectional subgroup levels, while accounting for the statistical support of finer-grained estimates. The results show that interventions can receive substantially different assessments across accuracy/AUROC, sensitivity, and false-positive rate, and that marginal demographic summaries can conceal heterogeneous error profiles within their constituent intersections, including among larger subgroups. These findings highlight the importance of evaluating fairness interventions at both complementary metric and subgroup resolutions, while accounting for the intervention target and the reliability of subgroup estimates.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Abdullah Al Noman, Fahmid Al Rifat, Tahrima Hashem, Syed Muhammad Ibne Zulfiker, Rishov Paul, Tanzima HAshem. 2026-10-01. Beyond Demographic Balance: Multi-Metric and Intersectional Evaluation of Fairness in MIMIC-IV Mortality Prediction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01645
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.