Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.03334

A population-level assessment framework for flood-related wellbeing from public discourse in Ireland

Róisín Luo·Karyn Morrissey
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

\ textbf{Background.} Ireland's position on the eastern North Atlantic exposes it to moisture-laden westerlies and frequent low-pressure systems, generating abundant precipitation and substantial pluvial and fluvial flood risk. Climate change is intensifying heavy rainfall and compound flood risk, with consequences extending beyond physical damage and conventional economic indicators. \ textbf{Method.} We present a framework for assessing flood-related wellbeing from unobtrusive public discourse over time. The framework develops an assessment instrument comprising three complementary constructs: \emph{distress}, \emph{functional disruption}, and \emph{institutional alienation}, capturing flood-related impacts on affective appraisal, daily functioning, and social and institutional connectedness. To enable population-scale analysis of complex cognitive and psychological responses, we develop a dedicated flood-related wellbeing reasoning model (\textsc{Wellbeing-Former}) that reads evidence of flood-related wellbeing, assigns evidence-grounded scores, and produces transparent rationales. \textbf{Data, Results \& Implications.} Using the research platform \textsc{MCL} (Meta Content Library), we construct a flood-related discourse dataset by querying posts from Ireland containing the terms \emph{flood}, \emph{rain}, and \emph{storm}. The resulting dataset comprises approximately \textbf{$224{,}000$} posts produced between 2012 and 2016. We apply the resulting \textsc{Wellbeing-Former} to this dataset to conduct a population-level analysis. This approach provides temporally sensitive evidence of experienced and anticipated flood impacts, complements survey-based assessment, and supports a multidimensional understanding of wellbeing under climate-related hazards for policy development, adaptation planning, public communication, and decision-making.

Explore related subjects

cs.CY

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Róisín Luo, Karyn Morrissey. 2026-10-02. A population-level assessment framework for flood-related wellbeing from public discourse in Ireland. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03334

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

"Lighting The Way For Those Not Here": How Can Technology Researchers Help Resist the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives (MMIR) Crisis?

Indigenous peoples across Turtle Island face disproportionate rates of disappearance and murder, a genocide rooted in settler-colonial violence and systemic erasure. Technology plays a crucial role in the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Relatives (MMIR) crisis: it perpetuates systemic violence and impedes investigations, yet also enables sites of advocacy, healing, and resistance. For example, Native communities utilize AMBER alerts, digital news, sovereign crowdsourced databases, social media groups, and resistance movements to mobilize searches, amplify awareness, and honor missing relatives. Yet little research in HCI has critically examined the role of technology in shaping the MMIR crisis. Thus, we qualitatively analyze 140 webpages to identify sociotechnical barriers that hinder communities' efforts, while highlighting actions that foster healing, safety, and resilience. We grounded our analysis in stories that resist epistemic erasure through relational accountability, critical humility, cultural sensitivity, and refusal. Finally, we provide recommendations for HCI to recognize self-determination and sovereignty of Indigenous technologies, direct action to support families, and honor Indigenous onto-epistemologies that cease epistemic violence.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

The impacts of artificial intelligence on environmental sustainability and human well-being

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being described as a transformative general-purpose technology, yet its impacts on environmental sustainability and human well-being remain poorly understood. Here, we conduct a systematic review of 1,291 studies selected from 6,655 records to map how the literature assesses these impacts. We find that current research provides a fragmented and uneven account of AI's consequences for human well-being and the environment. Environmental studies focus narrowly on energy use and CO2 emissions (72%) and rarely consider systemic effects (11%), while well-being studies are predominantly conceptual and overlook subjective well-being, cognitive capabilities, and upstream supply-chain impacts. Strikingly, 82% of environmental studies portray AI's impacts as positive, but this finding is driven by the large number of application-level studies. Well-being analyses show a near-even split (44% positive; 46% negative). However, this split masks differences across well-being dimensions: impacts on income and health are generally expected to be positive, whereas impacts on inequality, social cohesion, and employment are expected to be negative. Based on our findings, we identify important priorities for future research: environmental assessments should consider systemic effects and indicators beyond energy and CO2, while well-being research should prioritise empirical analysis. More fundamentally, research must consider environmental sustainability and human well-being together, recognising that AI's impacts are deeply interconnected. Towards this aim, we extend an existing three-level framework for the climate impacts of AI to include broader environmental impacts and human well-being, providing a unified basis to assess AI impacts and guide its development towards environmental sustainability and human flourishing.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

A Semi-Automated System for Generating Dialogue-Based TTS Lessons Using Large Language Models: An Exploratory Study of Educational Potential

This study proposes a semi-automated system for generating dialogue-based lessons using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Text-to-Speech (TTS) technology, and exploratorily examines its educational potential via a practical quasi-experiment. The system augments rather than replaces educators through a three-stage human-in-the-loop workflow (LLM-based slide/narration generation, educator review, automated audiovisual integration), and introduces a novel method for generating Expert-Novice dialogue narration based on cognitive apprenticeship theory. In a study of 245 first-year high school students who sequentially experienced three lesson formats (instructor voice, single-speaker TTS, dialogue TTS; content differed across sessions, limiting format/content separation), we conducted within-subject (Friedman test, N<=183) and repeated cross-sectional (Mann-Whitney U, N=229/206) analyses. TTS audio did not substantially degrade the learning experience versus instructor voice, supported by TOST equivalence testing. Dialogue TTS was significantly superior to single TTS in comprehension (p=.006, q=.025) and cognitive engagement (p=.019, q=.048); enjoyment was non-significant after FDR correction (q=.081) but reached significance after controlling for prior knowledge (proportional-odds model, OR=1.65, q=.025), and these advantages were not attributable to prior-knowledge imbalance. Conversely, single TTS was superior in audio naturalness (p<.001, q<.001, r=-.238), revealing a trade-off between dialogue's benefits and higher extraneous cognitive load. Dialogue format was preferred by 66.9% of learners as most enjoyable (p<.001). These results reflect a fixed-order design; replication is needed before generalizing them as effects of lesson format. This study provides a theoretical and empirical basis for the educational acceptability of TTS audio and for TTS lesson-format design.

cs.CY↗