Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.03511

Interactive Machine Learning Interfaces for Disease Risk Prediction: Effects on Risk Perception and Behaviour

Abstract

Machine learning risk models are increasingly being used in patient-facing health tools, but it remains unclear how well users understand the information these systems present. In this work, we study how people interpret an interactive Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) risk interface and whether interacting with it influences their attitudes toward behavioural change. Through an exploratory mixed-methods study with 15 participants, we compare participants' perceived understanding with their actual understanding and identify key themes from qualitative interviews. We find that participants often understood the interface better than they initially believed, but still faced important barriers related to unclear terminology, ambiguous risk framing, and limited explanations of model inputs. Finally, we propose relevant design guidelines and discuss broader issues surrounding trust and fairness. Our findings highlight the importance of intuitive visual design, familiar presentation, and clear explanations in patient-facing ML interfaces.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tiffany Ngai, Max Homm, Matthew Bradbury, Anamaria Crisan. 2026-10-02. Interactive Machine Learning Interfaces for Disease Risk Prediction: Effects on Risk Perception and Behaviour. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.03511

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

VIRENA: Virtual Arena for Research, Education, and Democratic Innovation

Digital platforms shape how people communicate, deliberate, and form opinions. Studying these dynamics has become harder because of restricted data access, ethical limits on real-world experiments, and the technical demands of existing research tools. VIRENA (Virtual Arena) is a platform for controlled experiments in realistic social media environments. Several participants can interact at the same time in replicas of feed-based platforms (Instagram, Facebook, Reddit, X) and messaging apps (WhatsApp, Messenger). AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) join the participants with configurable personas and human-like timing. Researchers set up experiments in a visual interface without programming: they define conditions, schedule stimulus content, add moderation rules, assign participants randomly to conditions, and export the data. VIRENA supports designs that were hard to run before, such as studying human--AI interaction in realistic social settings, comparing moderation interventions, and observing group deliberation as it unfolds. Participants and data stay within institutional control, and the platform links to survey and recruitment tools. This paper describes how VIRENA works and how to use it.

cs.HC↗

DimSteer: Steering LLM Authoring with Automatically Discovered Stylistic Controls

Large language model writing interfaces often make users steer outputs by repeatedly articulating desired changes in natural language. Yet writers may recognize useful stylistic directions only after seeing alternatives, making revision recall-heavy. We present DimSteer, an authoring interface that samples prompt-local completions, discovers high-variance activation-space axes of variation, labels them, and exposes them as sliders with pole previews, diff comparison, and reset controls. Users can manipulate discovered dimensions, reducing the need to reformulate prompts for each stylistic adjustment. In a within-subjects study with 16 participants against a matched prompt-only baseline, DimSteer reduced mental demand, effort, and frustration while preserving comparable perceived success. Participants valued the surfaced dimensions, yet 15 of 16 disagreed that they would have thought to request the same changes in a prompt. Results suggest prompt-local controls can shift LLM authoring from recall-based prompting toward recognition-based exploration and direct manipulation, while preserving prompting for open-ended edits.

cs.HC↗

Evaluating Just Noticeable Differences in Layered Opacity Visualizations

Opacity is a widely used channel in data visualization, but it remains less well understood compared to channels such as color, length, size, etc. Recent work from Meng et al. investigated the impact of opacity across competing color schemes, finding that certain color schemes were associated with better participant accuracy. We examine these effects further in a controlled two-alternative forced-choice setup to determine whether opacity differences are truly equal across possible opacity comparison ranges. In a within-subjects study with 96 trials, including two competing color schemes (best and worst from Meng et al.) and 48 opacity pairs, we find little differences between color schemes but larger individual differences in accuracy. Further, results show stable performance in middle opacity ranges, with more errors occurring when comparing extreme values. We discuss potential implications for design guidelines and further study and make our study materials, analysis scripts, and data available at https://osf.io/zv9dx/overview?view_only=38d03cea1b3d42788593e3e6b1016cfd.

cs.HC↗