Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.04327

Trust the View That Sees the Target: Mining Cross-View Conflicts for Reliability-Gated Disaster Damage Assessment

Yifan Yang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

After a disaster, building damage is assessed from overhead tiles and ground-level photographs, and most methods fuse the two views symmetrically, trusting both equally for every building. This paper focuses on the samples where that assumption fails: the conflict cases, on which two independently trained single-view models disagree. We mine such cases from three paired collections (inspection photographs from the 2025 Eaton wildfire and street-view panoramas from Hurricanes Ian and Milton, each matched to very-high-resolution overhead tiles), where they make up 10-33% of the data. On these samples an oracle that simply trusts the correct view beats every fusion method we tested by 0.37-0.41 accuracy, and the gap survives longer training, calibration, and backbone changes. We recover part of it with a visibility-conditioned reliability gate: a linear model that decides which view to trust from building-visibility features, calibrated per-view confidences, and the disagreement itself. On the wildfire data the gate is the only method that significantly beats calibrated probability averaging (+0.051 on conflicts, p=0.0001) and end-to-end fusion (+0.072, p<10^-4); on the panoramic datasets it matches them. A controlled field-of-view experiment explains why: cropping panoramas toward the building doubles the benefit of fusion, whereas random crops of the same size do not. Finally, the spatial density of conflicts predicts tile-level damage without labels (Spearman r=0.615, p=0.001). Mining conflicts turns "does fusion help?" into "which view should be trusted, where, and why?".

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yifan Yang. 2026-10-03. Trust the View That Sees the Target: Mining Cross-View Conflicts for Reliability-Gated Disaster Damage Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1145/3849732.3857333

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Deep Learning Reforms Image Matching: A Survey and Outlook

Image matching, which establishes correspondences between two images to recover 3D structure and camera geometry, is a cornerstone of computer vision and underpins a wide range of applications, including visual localization, 3D reconstruction, and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM). Traditional pipelines, composed of a detector-descriptor, a feature matcher, an outlier filter, and a geometric estimator, falter in challenging scenarios. Recent advances in deep learning have substantially improved both their robustness and accuracy. This survey reviews how deep learning has progressively transformed the classical image matching pipeline. Our taxonomy is aligned with the traditional pipeline and covers two aspects: i) replacing individual steps with learnable alternatives, including learnable detector-descriptors, outlier filters, and geometric estimators; and ii) merging multiple steps into end-to-end learnable modules, including middle-end sparse matchers, end-to-end semi-dense/dense matchers, and pose regressors. We first examine the design principles, advantages, and limitations of both aspects, and then benchmark representative methods on relative pose estimation, homography estimation, matching accuracy assessment, visual localization, and 3D reconstruction. Finally, we discuss open challenges and directions for future research. By systematically categorizing and evaluating learning-based methods, this survey offers a clear overview of how image matching is evolving and where further progress is needed. The project repository is available at https://github.com/ZizhuoLi/awesome-image-matching-survey.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

RefAtomNet++: Advancing Referring Atomic Video Action Recognition using Multi-Trajectory Semantic Retrieval

Who is being described, where are they, and what are they doing? Referring Atomic Video Action Recognition (RAVAR) answers these questions jointly by grounding a natural-language reference to a person and recognizing that person's fine-grained atomic actions in complex multi-person videos. Progress in RAVAR is constrained by limited benchmark scale and weak alignment between fine-grained linguistic and scene cues and temporally coherent visual cues. We address both challenges with a new dataset and model. We introduce RefAVA++, a large-scale dataset comprising 2,950,920$ frames, 75,111 annotated person instances, and 80 atomic action categories. Its references describe appearance and spatial attributes while deliberately omitting action labels, requiring models to infer actions directly from visual cues. We further propose RefAtomNet++, which models complementary semantics at the holistic-sentence, partial-keyword, and scene-attribute levels. Fine-grained semantic cues retrieve aligned visual tokens across time to construct trajectories, which are aggregated through Mamba-based state-space modeling and fused using multi-hierarchical semantic-aligned cross-attention. This design enables accurate joint person localization and multi-label atomic action recognition. Equipped with the InternVideo2.5 backbone, RefAtomNet++ achieves 50.39%/51.14% mIoU, 59.21%/59.55% mAP, and 73.89%/76.59% AUROC on RefAVA, and 49.49%/50.33% mIoU, 62.33%/61.90% mAP, and 76.06%/76.10% AUROC on RefAVA++ validation/test sets, respectively. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/KPeng9510/refAVA2.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

3ViewSense: Spatial and Mental Perspective Reasoning from Orthographic Views in Vision-Language Models

Current Large Language Models have achieved Olympiad-level logic, yet Vision-Language Models paradoxically falter on elementary spatial tasks like block counting. This capability mismatch reveals a critical ``spatial intelligence gap,'' where models fail to construct coherent 3D mental representations from 2D observations. We uncover this gap via diagnostic analyses showing the bottleneck is a missing view-consistent spatial interface rather than insufficient visual features or weak reasoning. To bridge this, we introduce \textbf{3ViewSense}, a framework that grounds spatial reasoning in Orthographic Views. Drawing on engineering cognition, we propose a ``Simulate-and-Reason'' mechanism that decomposes complex scenes into canonical orthographic projections to resolve geometric ambiguities. By aligning egocentric perceptions with these allocentric references, our method facilitates explicit mental rotation and reconstruction. Empirical results on spatial reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing baselines, with consistent gains on occlusion-heavy counting and view-consistent spatial reasoning. The framework also improves the stability and consistency of spatial descriptions, offering a scalable path toward stronger spatial intelligence in multimodal systems.~\footnote{https://github.com/Jasaxion/3ViewSense}

cs.CV↗